If Lobsters evolved from crabs, as the Theory of Evolution contends, then why are there still crabs?

Question

What do you score this question, I give it about a 6, maybe a 6.5, but timeing is crucial some fundia just called Evolution evil so, does timeing make it a 7?

Answer 1

Hmmm, a clever and amusing twist on a tiresome question. But I don't think I can go higher than 6.7.

Answer 2

When you breed a new breed of rose or horse, why is the original breed still around? Breeding and evolution is the same thing, only people provide the selection, not nature.

I'd score that question about a -3.

It shows a profound lack of knowledge about evolution.

An entire species doesn't evolve into another species. One small group will have a member that has a mutation - the interbreeding in that isolated group, assuming the mutation is advantageous, changes that group. A series of these mutations, filtered by natural selection, produces new species. The entire species doesn't become involved.

Answer 3

That just proves evolution is ALL wrong...lobsters should have evolved into crabs...everyone knows they are much tastier.

Answer 4

Someone told me Crabs and Lobster are just big bugs. Dang I wish they hasn't 'cause they just don't taste the same now!
†

Answer 5

Lobsters didn't evolve from crabs- they are both crustaceans and closely related but no one suggests one evolved from the other.

Answer 6

I hope that this isn't a serious question because someone who is so clueless about what evolution states should not even consider critiquing it. It's hard to critique something you haven't the slightest idea about.

Answer 7

When Paris Hilton dies, crabs will go extinct, due to habitat loss.

Answer 8

Question done fell below 0.

Answer 9

Timing gives it a 7.5, normal circumstances would have been 6.5

Answer 10

I try them at Red Lobster the other day. They taste mm.. mm... good!