If the German Nazi started to occupy England, Britain, would you fight the occupation?

Question

It’s a ‘simple’ question; please provide a ‘simple’ answer.

This relates to the illegal occupation of Palestine, where people are occupied and are resisting the occupation and fighting to get their land back.

Forget the long history to biblical times and relate this to the current situation.

If your land was occupied, would you not fight to get it back, would you, if you were alive during World War Two have fought the Nazi’s rather than give your country to them?

Obviously, most people would answer ‘Yes’, then why does the world deny the Palestinians from fighting for sovereignty?

Answer 1

I put the kingdom of God first in my life, so whatever government occupies the country I live in, I would do whatever they tell me to do. But if they tell me to go against my God, I will refuse, even if they say they would execute me.

Answer 2

it truly is critical to note that each and each u . s . has a aspect of ethnocentricity about it. To the Russians (in the previous u.s.) the Battles of Stalingrad, Kiev, Warsaw and Kharkov were the large turning factors contained in the conflict. They even had their own call for the conflict, The Patriotic conflict. in case you ask a British historian, the large battles were El Alamein, Tobruk, and Caen. Canada also seems at Caen as a victory. The French will inspect liberation of Paris as a French victory, and morn on the tragedies at Mers El Kabir (the position the British sunk the French fleet) and the various retaliations by technique of the Germans. The record is going on. those international locations do not particularly morn the tragedies at say Marmedy like we do. they don't look on the victories of Omaha sea coast, the Falais hollow, or the Bulge like we do. there became a French textbook that fairly reported the U. S. in a section about WWII. Its unhappy, yet it truly is how maximum international locations are. That stated, I do agree that maximum individuals do not understand the very undeniable truth that each and each u . s . gave a particular volume to stay away from the fall of the Allies. Had the British failed contained in the conflict of england, united statesa. does no longer were able to land on D-Day, or maybe Torch. India could have then fallen to the jap and lets lose the flexibility to furnish China. to assert the least, it may were rather undesirable without Britain. same extends to Russia, Australia, (loose) Poland and French forces, and Canada. As for the films, U-571 is faulty six ideas from Tuesday! The individuals did not launch a secret project to discover Enigma. It became stumbled on by technique of the British acidentally even as the U-Boat commander did not scuttle his boat. Saving deepest Ryan also should not be used as a historic handbook. It became set on the farthest aspect of the Normandy landings, so as which could clarify the absence of our British best buddy. Hollywood does a significant disservice to historic previous as an finished, so bare that in ideas.

Answer 3

Palestinians seemingly take great joy in fighting one another. To acquaint Israel (I assume) as a Nazi state is very wrong. Your question is illogical and irrational. Why should the world have another state where Islam fights Islam?

Answer 4

Giving the jews Israel after WW2 was a bad idea, period. All it could ever do is create divisions, wars and hatred. I sympathise with the palestinians, as they didn't ever get consulted when the UK decided to give the jews Israel. And they don't get consulted now, when Israel builds its big walls all over palistinian land.

I would fight my hardest to keep the nazis out of England. Words are an understated weapon though. I wish less people would turn to violence and more to dialogue.

Answer 5

since when do people actually own any piece of this Earth? The land is for everybody and if you lost if to a stronger force or power, well too bad for you mister, move on.

Answer 6

a few people only desny the right of Palestinians to fight people whi fight them...
sure media have a high hand on that view

Answer 7

Double standards.