No. Natural magic and spirituality imply some sort of supernatural action. Science explicitly prohibits considering the possibility of such action. You cannot bake a cake if one of the recipe steps is "Then a miracle happens!".
2007-03-06 15:25:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your post is filled with mistakes. The double slit experiment does not prove nothing happens until it's observed. It proves that observations can change results in certain circumstances, but whether or not observed something is still happening. The uncertainty principle only holds that a fundamental particles exact position and exact momentum cannot be known simultaneously. That's not the same thing as being in 2 places at once. There is no known biological mechanism for creating quantum entangled fundamental particles and sending information as complicated as human emotions or visions through such entanglement. So the fact that quantum entanglement has been validated does not in and of itself make human telepathy plausible. Whether the universe is actually matter or a hologram is subject to debate, and the fact that atoms are 99% space doesn't weigh in favor of one view over another. It's unknown whether "everything" in the universe is connected through dark matter and dark energy. But so what if it is? You make more of this "connection" than is warranted, IMO. You don't define "spirituality" so it's hard to answer your main question. From a simple definition of "what happens after death" I don't think science is close at all to determining with any degree of certainty what actually happens after we die. You seem to use the term much more broadly though, speaking of "connections" and the "source" of those connections. Just saying something is "connected," like saying nature is connected through roots, doesn't say anything particularly meaningful (and I assume you mean actual real world plant roots here). You have to establish that the connection is of some special quality or nature that allows you to transcend the basic physical nature of the connection in order to claim it means something more. Just because dark matter may be everywhere and we are here and life in the Andromeda galaxy is over there doesn't really mean that the dark matter "connects" us. So I don't expect science to discover a meaningful connection between everything that in some way implies a god is involved. Ever.
2016-03-16 06:19:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you think you can scientifically prove magic then do it. If it's provable you should be able to design verifiable, repeatable experiments without spending a lot of money.
Good luck. If you succeed you'll be the first. Your name will be a household word. You'll be more famous than Albert Einstein. Imagine the book deals....you'll be richer than J.K. Rowling.
2007-03-06 15:50:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science deals with things in the natural universe. These things are outside that realm, so, no...science will not be able to prove these things.
2007-03-06 15:28:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What exactly is natural magic? Sounds like mystical BS to me!
2007-03-06 15:31:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Somewhere between Newton, Tesla and Organic Chemistry there is a lot of supporting evidence for ancient pantheist beliefs!
We are all related...my sister! ; )
Oh yea...Quantum Physics!
2007-03-06 15:31:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It has been tried. It always seems to break down when you put it in a controlled environment. But hey, I am willing to look at what you have as long as it is good data that can actually pass peer review.
2007-03-06 15:26:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think it is very possible.
For one, science is trying to find explanations for the paranormal.
Will parapsycology, and EVP(Electronic Voice Phenominon).
Anything is possible.
2007-03-06 15:26:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe some aspects of it will be proven in the future.
2007-03-06 15:27:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by noncrazed 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
2007-03-06 15:31:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by gwhiz1052 7
·
0⤊
0⤋