English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since the state mandated it in '06
Do the people in jail get free health care then?

2007-03-06 13:03:13 · 2 answers · asked by martywdx 4 in Business & Finance Insurance

2 answers

Actually, the law doesn't go into effect until 7/1/07. It also doesn't apply to illegal immigrants, or those under 19 years of age. A special exemption can be granted to residents who can prove they're unable to afford health insurance.

This law does not include a penalty of jail for violations. Beginning with the 2007 state income tax return, those who refuse to enroll in a health insurance plan (either through work, on their own, or through the State high risk pool, known as "The Connector") will lose their personal exemption, worth roughly $200 a year. And beginning on January 1, 2008, uninsured people will be subject to penalties of roughly $150 a month. That's tough, but it's necessary to change the behavior of people who are used to going without insurance, either because they are healthy or are accustomed to relying on the Uncompensated Care Pool to pay for their care.

2007-03-06 23:25:25 · answer #1 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 0 0

Treason? No. it is at maximum suitable of questionable constitutionality, and that i does no longer be stunned interior the least to work out it challenged interior the courtroom equipment till now it replaced into carried out in 2013. Even without the remarkable well-being care equipment this invoice instruments up, the fining for non-possession of medical well-being coverage is an intensive and unsafe growth of federal potential, as there are few issues that the federal government compels people to do (i'm able to in basic terms think of of two-- taxes and militia conscription-- or maybe then the 2d is used in basic terms in emergency circumstances). i could very almost chalk it as much as a violation of the Fourteenth modification. No, the only thank you to get rid of a Senator or Congressperson in need of balloting is to have their respective residing house expel her or him, which they do by skill of balloting, in many situations after some admission of wrongdoing. With a Democratic controlled Congress I see that as exceedingly no longer likely. Cheers! ©2009 SinisterMatt. All Rights Reserved.

2016-11-28 03:09:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers