my car has been park on my drive way, dealing with insurer of the stolen car i have been told ,no claim can bee made because of RTA INSURER AND ARITCLE 75 INSURER, is there any chance to claim from insurance company of the owner of the stolen car witch damage my car? My car is on third part only. if any one have similar situation, please help!!!
2007-03-06 10:29:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Insurance & Registration
In my opinion you have no chance, if the car was stolen then the owner's insurance in respect of damage to your car has been rendered invalid as it was driven by an unauthorised person, your only chance is to sue the driver personally if you know who he is
2007-03-06 10:38:48 · answer #1 · answered by barn owl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm guessing that if you've got 3rd party only, you'll have to provide evidence that it was NOT your fault. Unlikely.
I doubt very much that you could claim off the insurance company of the owner of the stolen car, as the thief will not have been covered by any insurance policy.
Good luck. Sounds like you'll need it.
2007-03-06 10:39:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should be able to claim through the Motor Insurance Bureau which is basically a big money pot that all insurance companies pay into for this sort of thing. Check it out on the net for info on how to claim (sorry don't know any links) The insurance companies are just trying to pull one over on you, as they always do when it comes to paying out
2007-03-06 11:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Ian UK 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd suggest you have a word with a solicitor, they usually give a first interview free. You won't be able to claim on the owner's insurance, but I'm sure there's a fund set up specifically to deal with this sort of thing.
Good luck.
2007-03-06 18:41:56 · answer #4 · answered by champer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have no chance in claiming from the owner of the stolen car because he was not involved personally - driving it.
2007-03-06 22:09:28 · answer #5 · answered by WelshLad 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're completely harmless of any offence - you have no longer something to pay and not something to respond to for. The autos have been static so the lady observed them there earlier SHE selected to do the wear. She had many different alternatives to make - no longer least, being lifelike and arranged which you would be able to head your automobile. Her strikes under the regulation have been - no longer THAT expected of a lifelike individual - for this reason she has dedicated offender harm because of the fact her strikes have been planned. you would be a fool to pay something. you're no longer responsible for yet another persons intolerance or short fuse temper. Even of you by no ability attended the scene to pass your automobile she could nevertheless have not got any applicable to reason the wear because of the fact she had option alternatives she could have made.
2016-12-18 16:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have a look here for Motor Insurers Bureau
http://www.claimsmastergroup.com/The_News/Personal_Injury_Accident_Claim_-_Related_Articles/Motor_Insurers_Bureau_Compensation_Claims.htm
2007-03-07 02:59:28 · answer #7 · answered by ragingmk 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thats a bad situation unless you have full tort insurance.thats when you can sue your own insurance company.
2007-03-06 11:02:59 · answer #8 · answered by ken j 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋