How come the wings disappeared on the plane that hit the Pentagon?

Question

and how come a perfect hole was punched through 3 of the "C-Rings" ???

Answer 1

Who's to say it was actually a plane..the evidence is swaying more towards it being a missile..we're being told a bunch of lies!! If it was a plane, and they say it combusted leaving no remains of the plane then how come they were able to identify 134 of the 138 passengers?? Would they have not burnt too??...I would have thought more so than steel!
Hmmmmmmmm

Answer 2

A plane full of jet fuel had the physics to punch whole into the pentagon, the weakest part of the plane (the wings) would have been surely demolished....if the engineers believe it was possible, then the average laymen like me also believes it. Only the fools who think FDR bombed Pearl Harbor, that aliens crashed at Roswell and that the US never landed on the moon believe in the 9/11 conspiracy. All the other rational people just roll their eyes at the people who are easily duped.

If one believes that the US govt is competent enough to pull off the largest mass murder in history, when they couldn't even cover up Watergate or Gulf of Tonkin incident, (which by the way, only a handful of people knew about it), then i guess there's no convincing you. Your faith in a competent govt. is astounding.

Let's hope that a Katrina type catastrophe doesn't hit your neighborhood and you find out the hard way how competent they are in coming to your aid.

Answer 3

Since others already explained about the wings quite accurately I'll comment about the hole. The conspiracy theorists say that was a missile. That's silly for any number of reasons. On impact a missile would have shattered in the explosion, not continued through three more walls. That is what they are designed to do. You cannot have one both exploding on impact, which was recorded on film, and smashing through several walls. That is not possible.

More likely some portion of the plane, possibly an engine, made that hole. It would be just about the right size. Or perhaps something solid in the cargo bay under the passenger compartment.

A few other points. That hole was too large for an air to surface missile as was the explosion. Something large enough to make that hole OR that big of an explosion would have had to travel on a ballistic path. There is no way on earth it could have passed through three walls because it would have been traveling almost straight down at the point of impact. All missiles are fairly fragile tings, not one would have pased through more than one wall.

Lastly, how do the conspiracy theorists explain the two eye witnesses who saw the plan come in or the missing plane that was tracked on radar to the Pentagon or the absolute lack of even a single conspirator talking about it to anybody?

EDIT: Ineedmoney, it was a 757, not a 747. Get your facts straight. An engine nacelle is far more likely to have come loose than for a missile to have travelled through the walls. No, an airplane is designed to fly differently than a missile. You have no clue what you are talking about. There are also plenty of pics. the news organizations have mountains of them, the same with WTC.

Answer 4

WTF?!?! are u serious.... a piece of the engine came out and made the hole? thats extremely rediculous! Also u refute the point of a cruise missile making that hole because it would have been traveling downwards but the same could be sayed of an airplane... and no a piece of the engine does not just magicly detach and travel through 3 rings of concrete! A 747 carrying enough fuel for cross country flight and with a wing span of 212 feet and tail height of as tall as a six-story building would have reduced an entire wall section of the pentagon to rubble as well as various other sections... this is not a sesna! And why doesnt the government show more than just 3 pictures show explosions after intial impact and 2 more of smoke and fire? why not show all of it if u have nothing to hide! and what two witnesses were u refering to that stated they saw a plane? From what i have seen many more DoD and military personnel attest to seeing a missile or other type of U.F.O. of smaller size than an airplane. No matter what you say taking into consideration the dimensions of a 747 and the damage shown they two do not add up.

Answer 5

Almost the whole plane disappeared after it hit. High velocity impacts often disrupt the structural integrity of one or more of the impacting objects. I have crashed a few cars in my time. After the crash, there are often bits that seem to be missing, such as the front end.

What is with the missile conspiracy? It's stupid. If the government wanted make it seem like a plane hit the WTC/Pentagon, they could just remote control a plant right into it. The remote control idea is slightly less stupid than the missile idea, but people like the missile theory.

America will never be destroyed by terrorists. It will be destroyed by morons overpopulating.

Answer 6

Like most of the planes - including the WTC planes, they disintegrated upon contact.....

They didn't find the WTC planes either - nor the one that went down in Pennsylvania.... They didn't find bodies, desks, computers, nothing....it was all vaporized.

If you do some research and reading on the internet, you will find out just what happens to an airplane when it is traveling almost 600 miles per hour, loaded with fuel and is rammed into a structure.

Answer 7

on your 3 factors: a million) people will see what they assume, no longer what's actual there. Wake me up while hoards of folk say they observed a cruise missile. 2) Are you going to base an thought on slips of the tongue and close to-slips of the tongue? by way of fact this is probably no longer sound judgment. 3) It would not teach a airplane OR a cruise missile by way of fact they the two fly truly truly quickly. an complication-free examine on Wikipedia shows a factor of the airplane's fuselage on the backyard of the Pentagon.

Answer 8

well, simply put, a team of highly trained specialists, working in close conjunction with the people of the planet grendale alpha 7, moved in sometime before the video cameras got there and used their plasma rays to vaporize it, and then cleaned up making sure there was plenty of evidence to make it look like no plane had ever hit the pentagon. or maybe thats just what happens when something stops suddenly going several hundred miles an hour. things just get obliterated. of course aliens could really be doing everything they can to fuel the conspiracy theory fire. (is the sarcasm showing through, or should i turn on the webcam so you can see me roll my eyes?)

Answer 9

Off topic, the company that did renovations to the area of the pentagon that got hit also were doing renovations to the WTC but this company specialized in buildings the age of the Pentagon and had no experience with skyscrapers. I know this means little but worth looking into.

Answer 10

Because you are also Nancy, Jazmyn and about 37 other personalities, all with a 9/11 conspiracy theory that you need to repost 300 times. Interesting , Nancy-Jazmyn-Lisa, in this particular personality, your profile doesn't mention your husband being in Iraq. Did they change your medication dosage or something? Or did your armadillo helmet fall off as the voices in your head were dictating this latest new profile of yours?

Answer 11

Because an aircraft traveling at over 800 mph hit a concrete building thats why.