Good question!
Most students can speak english by elementry school, so I say yes. I think they should atleast be given a chance to get their citizenship.
I think there should be other factors as well, but it's a start.
2007-03-06 01:10:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Open Minded Human 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
No. These are called anchor babies and the problem is too many people come here just to have babies so they can stay. There have been many high profile cases about this (the woman holed up in a Chicago church being one of the most recent, as well as the south american couple that came to US on vacation specifically during the ninth month of the wife's pregnancy).
I say no because if these people really have a valid reason for coming here they can ask for political asylum or sanctuary from persecution in their country of origin. It's a fact, a Mexican who was gay requested asylum in US from persecution and the legal system let him be a citizen.
The reason anchor babies are a problem is not the baby, it's the parents. The parents have the baby here and they stay without applying for status and without adopting our culture. The kids in the schools in LA that are children of illegals have parents that don't speak english and don't assimilate. They kids can't get far because their parents can't help them learn and study so the textbooks are unread or worse yet sold because they do not appreciate the value of the books and think the school just gives them away because they don't understand. That's also why they go to the emergency room for health care, they don't understand it closes hospitals and the drain not being part of the system puts on society. They don't understand what it means to be a civilized nation. Civilization is only as vast as cooperation and if enough people ignore the law or systems in place that have been set up to handle such things in balance with society then you have a degradation of society. In short, it brings the third world country here. That's why there's an immigration process throttling the flux of people becoming citizens and living here and the impact it has on society as a whole. As we;ve seen when it's not throttled the effects can be devastating. Just look at the hospital closures and quality of education in California.
Simply put No, it's a slippery slope.
2007-03-06 01:32:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jake Lockley 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
No they shouldn't. For starters, completing high school does not mean they have assimilated into American society. There are some students who go through school and by the 12th grade they still don't even speak fluent English.
Also, there are other requirements for becoming a US citizen besides completing the citizenship test. It would be silly to grant citizenship based on that one factor.
I do feel sympathy for these kids who were brought here by their parents and feel that this is their home country, but it is their parents' fault if these kids get deported.
2007-03-06 00:58:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Help me 1
·
5⤊
2⤋
No. Such logic means that if my parents were to rob banks of millions of dollars and put all that money into some account in my name, that I would be entitled to that money because I am not to blame for my parents illegal behavior. ALL illegals should be repatriated. Give them a year or so to settle their finances here, then they get to go home. We won't charge them for the education they got here illegally, but we don't want them to stay. Doing so will only encourage more illegal immigration.
2007-03-06 01:32:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
i've got seen examine that criminal immigrants are much less probable to commit crime than the community inhabitants (they're screened again in, undergo in suggestions) and unlawful immigrants are extra probable to. besides the undeniable fact that, the biggest situation is the revolving door and lack of ability to music people who do commit crime, it extremely is why you notice that easy of 7 or 9 (I forget approximately which) convictions according to convicted unlawful in accordance to a pair FBI learn or different. people have been making use of borders to avert duty for crime on the grounds that long till now Butch Cassidy did. those might by no potential be enable in legally, and we don't choose them in any respect. i may be everywhere in the belief of determining what to do with the sturdy style here on an analogous time as securing our borders and cutting welfare form reward (i might even carry off on the college situation for a year or 2) see you later as we deported all gang contributors illegally here and all convicted criminals jointly with DUI violators here. DHS says 650,000 would be in our community jails and state prisons from which they don't look to be deported, oftentimes, this year on my own. What do you think of the immigration image might appear like if those have been long gone? whilst they at the instant are not even going for that low putting fruit, and are not policing reward, who're they kidding making great splashes with raids against the style gainfully employed? This desires a answer, yet not something they're doing makes me think of they choose one.
2016-10-17 09:37:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no illegal means illegal and ma bey instead of sending them back we should round up all illegals and make them work off the debt that they have produced to our government, our hospitals, our schools, our law enforcement, etc and to the people whom like myself can't find a job and we also need to fine the employers of illegals and close down their business and fine them and make the business owners work side by side with the illegals to pay off their debt to not paying taxes on these people. I know my town could use some litter pickup and I need to be paid back for lost wages and lost jobs due to illegals (notice I say illegals not a race so it is not racist) leave my country or be a slave to it or enter properly
2007-03-06 04:08:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
According to the laws on the books, if their parents are law-abiding citizens who are friendly to US citizens and have come into the country legally, then yes. Otherwise, no.
"Children born to aliens who are lawfully inside the United States (resident or visitor), with the intention of amicably interacting with its people and obeying its laws" are considered citizens.
You asked about Canadians - this law applies to everyone regardless of race, creed, country of origin, religion, etc.
2007-03-06 01:56:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shrieking Panda 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. If there parents are illegal, they should have no right to become legal whether they were born in the US or not. Most countries of the world don´t allow you to have citizenship unless either of your parents are citizens, so why should the US be the exception to the rule?
2007-03-06 01:00:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Double 709 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
No, then if an international student completes his degree he/she should be also given citizenship.
Obtaining USA citizenship is more than just finishing HS, how many criminals have finished HS and learn US history and then continue their criminal lives.
Moreover, if the child is the offspring of an illegal alien, parents and children must be deported.
Illegals are criminals.
2007-03-06 01:19:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by rocio 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
By completing HS, they have assimilated into American society???????? How is that?????
It might be true that children were young when they entered the US, but didn't they and their families have ENOUGH TIME to become US Citizens since then???????????????????????????
2007-03-06 03:08:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by mikea_va 6
·
1⤊
0⤋