Please state your proof.
We need to see an inorganic area, anywhere, preferrable in nature, that magically spawned life that started evolving into higher forms.
Please lead us to that site or continue agreeing with the Scientific community that it is still a theory.
We need before and after pictures.
BUT, bear in mind Dr. Planck, an atheist scientist, has stated you taint something simply by taking a picture of it.
Didn't you see that Star Trek NG episode where Q took Picard back in time to see the primordial muck come together and nothing happened.
We want to see that somewhere.
Or, as an alternative you can document to us, with pictures, a lizard becoming a bird with wings and flying away.
That, too, will suffice.
We'd like to see the process, step by step.
We'd like to see a fish the lives in the waters, walk out on land and become an air breathing creature.
Please provide videos of this event.
Time coded videos.
We desperately want to see video of a Chimp in Africa that as never seen a human at close range, start fire with two pieces of wood and some kindling from leaves or something.
Or maybe one that fashions a wheel out of a bolder to move something heavy.
We'd like to see ONE animal, who is not trained by Annhieser Bush or MArlon Perkins, make a tool. Even if it's crude. A spear for fishing, that would be sufficient. A Chimp that taught themselves how to fish with a spear. Video please.
As for creationism. It is self-evident that IPods don't grow on trees and iron ore doesn't evolve into your new auto.
The only other creature on this Earth with any sense or any brain of any degree is a DOLPHIN, so maybe that's where man came from. Maybe science got it wrong.
All we know is that in millions of years Nature has evolved only ONE element that makes and uses tools and creates things. Only one? Then nature stops the process. One enough. Maybe nature, like God, got fed up with what it created and decided it was better just adding different color feathers to birds as a pasttime!
2007-03-06 00:03:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Just because the theory of evolution has been accepted by most biologists (christian or otherwise) does not mean it has been Proved true. You are confusing "accepted" with "proved" and "theory" with "fact". take, for example, copernicus' theory that the earth moved around the sun. it is a theory, not a fact. it is a theory that has been accepted by most people as a fact simply because it just makes sense. A fact supporting this theory would be that astronomers explaination of Mars' bizarre movements (foward, then backwards, then foward again) were very sloppy and complicated but these movenments were explained in a more simplified manner when copernicus put the sun in the middle, earth and Mars moving around the sun with earth on the inside tract. so the statement "Copernicus' theory similified the explanations of planatary movement" is a fact but "Planets move around the sun" it is still a theory. It cannot be tested, it cannot be proved, at least not untill we can fly so far into outerspace and look down on the solar system and observe the planets moving around the sun. Likewise, there is much evidance that supports the theory of evolution and there are many people that accept this theory as fact because it makes sense. However, even if there exists a scientific experiment that could prove evolution occured beyond reasonable doubt it would not prove that a Higher Power did not do the creating. you are confusing "evolution" with "it happened on accident"
2007-03-06 02:01:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alley C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A creation scientist is a person who is formally trained in a science discipline, but who approach their field of study and/or research from the belief that the universe was created by God. This listed here have at least a Masters degree in a science discipline. Many are actively engaged in research and publish in peer review journals.
Bill Hoesch is a creation scientist currently on staff as a Research Geologist, field tour guide, and speaker for the Institute for Creation Research. He received a bachelors degree in Geology from the University of Colorado and a Masters degree from the ICR Graduate School.
2007-03-05 23:28:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no theory that has been proven true. That is impossible. But Evolution has more proof than Creationism.
2007-03-05 23:12:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mary W 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1971) defines “creation” as “the act of creating,” and “creationism” as “a doctrine or theory of creation.” The same dictionary defines “ism” as “a distinctive doctrine, cause, system, or theory—often used disparagingly.”
In these 1980’s, “creationism” has become a true “ism” because of its adoption by political pressure groups, such as the Moral Majority. It is no longer a neutral term, but embodies extreme fundamentalist views of the Bible, such as the view that God created the earth and everything upon it in six days of 24 hours each. There are now more than 350 books in circulation setting out such “creationism” dogma. Jehovah’s Witnesses reject the unreasonable theories of “creationism” in favor of what the Bible really teaches about “creation.”
2007-03-05 23:05:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by papa G 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution Rocks!
2007-03-06 07:06:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Evolution has not been proven true there is no proof of evolution if there were then it would be heralded from all TV stations and rooftops so far there has been many claims of proof but the prtoof has never been shown! So what is, False is the proclamation of evolution being proved.This most likley is not the Answer you are looking for.
2007-03-05 23:47:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by I speak Truth 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not for me. I don't take the Old Testament literally. God created the universe and the bible says that a million years is but a day to God. I have no conflicts or need to worry about dinosaurs. God will one day confound the wisdom of the wise. Creationism and evolution can fit together in my world.
2007-03-05 23:16:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pamela 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Creationism is taken to be "scientific", then it is false. If it is taken to be a metaphor for the creation of the world written by people who couldn't possibly have understood the science behind it, then it can be considered "true" - just not in the scientific sense. Also, to which creation story are you referring? There are many different ones - not just "Genesis". Different religions and cultures have different versions of the creation story, all reflecting the cultures that they originated from. Many Native American cultures believe that the world was the back of a turtle - it reflects their culture, and from an early non-scientific viewpoint makes as much sense as a lot of the other stories.
2007-03-05 23:04:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Paul Hxyz 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
No, there are a lot of forms when it comes to Creationism. We can not state for a fact that there is not someone in charge of everything. We can rationalize it, but it does not make it false.
2007-03-05 23:16:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋