English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For over 17 years I have researched 'anti-truths', what are more commonly known as 'half-truths', discovering in 1994 that the definition of half-truth was incorrect.

You see a half-truth can be many things.

It was defined as a statement that is partially true; ie half true and half false.

Then it dawned on me one day that a half-truth could also be part of the truth, ie half of the truth, or part of the truth, but not the whole truth.

For example, "Stop violence against women' is two half truths.

First it only deals with violence, and not all the other forms of the abuse of women.

Second the slogan ignores the abuse of men and children.

So the statement while true, creates a polarizing lie. It is very, very deceptive.

My thesis is that this is the 'original sin' from the garden of eden, when "Adam and Eve" took of the tree of knowledge and were deceived by Satan to believe they would become like God to know The Truth ?

http://www.thejesuschristcode.com

2007-03-05 15:37:07 · 8 answers · asked by Caesar J. B. Squitti 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

The 'original sin' is still with us.
We still believe that 'knowledge' fruit of the tree, is 'The Truth', when in fact it is a truth.

A truth can lie to us, this is one dimension of a half-truth, that until recently has been unknown.

Adam and Eve lost touch with God in favor of 'fruit' from the tree of knowledge; the wire less connection to God was lost, and we are still lost ?

2007-03-05 21:58:51 · update #1

8 answers

Very deep.But in truth Eve was conned into partaking of the fruit and Adam seeing her wanted what he saw and took the fruit willingly.

2007-03-05 15:41:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I am a Christian, studied in the original manuscripts; "original sin", if what you mean by that is the "first sin", well I can tell you that is not accurate at all.
Satan sinned when he rebelled and started a great war, and that was billions of years before Adam and Eve ever walked on this earth.
Perhaps you could say that the sin of Eve and Adam was the first to occur in this earth age, and then it would be the full truth.
But certainly it was not the first sin ever of man.
That isn't even true if you picked up most any Bible and read it with a bit of understanding.
Your website is colorful, and has lots of words, but what exactly is the great truth they have to offer? I couldn't find it, unless you mean to tune in to Catholic radio broadcasts?
I don't get what you are trying to say here.

2007-03-05 23:49:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The sin in the garden of Eden was not eating the wrong produce. Eve had sex with satan and the offsping was cain

2007-03-05 23:54:56 · answer #3 · answered by dispesational7 3 · 0 0

So man become "self-aware", what was the sin?

What is described as original sin was merely the point in human evolution when humankind became self conscious. We could no longer live in a state of simple consciousness as animals, knowing only physical survival, but came to realize consciousness that exists beyond the physical.

2007-03-05 23:40:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Satan can think of nothing new...he uses the same strategy today as he did on Adam & Eve.... You see it on this Q & A thread constantly...

1. "Did God really say?" ....question God's Word.
2. "God knows if you eat that fruit you will be like him"....question God's intentions.
3. "You will not surely die"....outright contradict God and call Him a liar.

Sounds like the posts here on these threads?

2007-03-05 23:45:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Sin = Disobedience!
Righteous = Obedience!

Capeesh?

2007-03-05 23:43:50 · answer #6 · answered by אידיאליסטי™ 5 · 0 1

it may need some more working, you might try and make what you are saying more concise so folks (like me ^_^) can better understand what you have to say, but I wouldnt get discouraged if I were you keep working on it and how to present your ideas, even if you dont win over some religious scholar, people could still benefit from hearing your idea.

2007-03-05 23:48:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The truth is simple.

2007-03-05 23:45:31 · answer #8 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers