actually in 2005 the International Institute for Strategic Studies concluded that Iran could have a nuclear weapon by 2010 if they threw caution to the wind. The reason that they are a threat is: they supply arms to terrorists, advocate the annihilation of another country and if they wanted to close off all naval access to the Persian Gulf, cutting a majority of the WORLD'S oil supply, not just ours.
2007-03-05 15:10:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rich C 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
1 we took crap from them in the past and did nothing. We should at least pay them back. 2 Where ever it was that you got 10 years is way wrong. There is a good chance they already have it. N. Korea turned around out of the blue with it. 3 Iraq very well still could have wmd's. The news broadcast it for months before we came in. They could have easily given it away esp to Iran or even buried it. 4 Do you not remember or have you not learned about a country called RUSSIA? The for sure DO HAVE nukes and if you remember they supported Iran a few years ago. Iran might have held onto stuff or just bought more junk. 5 Learn HISTORY before making an ignorant comment like that.
2007-03-05 15:57:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kalludge Stoodunt 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The President of Iran has publicly stated that Israel is an illegal nation and should be wiped away from the face of the Earth. Now correct me if i am wrong, but isnt the US more than just about protecting itself??? Isnt the US also the defender of freedom and liberty of all people of the world? Why is Iran a threat??? Because its President does not recongize the right living in peace and freedom for all citizens of the Earth. He will use whatever ways neccessary to take our liberty and freedom away from us. Also, Iran couldnt ahve nukes for ten years min??? Are you crazy??? The technologies for building a nuclear reactor is much more advanced than building a nuke. They already have a nuclear reactor. A nuke is not far away because a nuke is basiclly an uncontrolled nuclear reactor. I am quite sure they already have the capability of producing nuclear weapons, they dont lack a delivery system to send it to US soil.
2007-03-05 18:29:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by PackLover 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
funny that they said the same about N. Korea and they shocked the world by testing 2 nukes! Iraq wasn't B.S. when Bill Clinton claimed WMD's, for the last 4 years of his presidency! It was also hillary's claim in 2002, that all the data she saw personally from her own private investigation Iraq had the WMD's! Read her interview with code pink and he explanation why she voted for the war. She used he hubby's team of experts, one being Sandy Burger! Clinton head of National security. these clowns will be a threat to the U.S.. we have an estimated 200,000 in the region. Iran doesn't need to launch a missle with a nuke on it. They can transport it across the border along with all the other weapons and ammunition they've been doing for the past 3 years. I believe thats the senario no one talks about. A nuke going off in Baghdad. you'd bee looking at 10's of thousand of AMERICAN service men and women killed. You've been azz f*cked by the liberal media saying bush lied. Every bit of his intel was run over from the Clinton administration, which we go back to Hillary's claim to why she voted for the war!
2007-03-05 15:06:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by JustShutUp 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Somebody is always suggesting that we remember to remember this or that. Fine. Well, many remember the A-bomb and Hiroshima and Nagaaki and that we were the first and so far, the only country to use a nuclear bomb. ANd there are other thngs to remember. Like Saddam and his WMD's. That never existed. Fool me once.......
Iran is a bigger threat to herself than anyone else. Looks to me as though Israel wants the U.S. to go in and do their dirty work EVEN as the US has supplied them with the very best in weapons and finances.
Plus Israel is much closer to this perceived enemy than the U.S.
Fool me once ...
You're right. It's all bs.Just an excuse.
and I wish Condi Rice would stop making announcements that she can't back up. I'm tired of her wishy-washy-back-and-forth change-their- minds- we'll- do- this- won't- do- that-Iran-is-a-threat-we-will-not-invade-we might-invade-
we-don't
KNOW WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO----rhetorical-nonsensical-
theatrics...........
2007-03-05 15:09:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clowns? Bullshit?
Iran has the exact same nuclear equipment as North Korea plus Iran has nuclear intelligence we sold to them back in the late 1980's and early 90's that NK doesn't have and Iran has more money than NK.
Read more.
2007-03-05 15:21:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by murkglider 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your right Iran is not a threat i remember something the French president Jacques Chirac mentioned unofficially
"let them have have them their not stupid enough to use them because they know if they used them every one of there city's would be destroyed within the hour"
it was something like that anyway he is a tough old bastard that Chirac
2007-03-05 15:16:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by ISO 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
experts additionally stated we've been secure from Pearl Harbor, that the internet wasn't a risk, and that the worldwide is hundreds of thousands of years previous. i will guess the in case you have been interior the Israeli's footwear you does no longer "take a deep breath and allow international kinfolk paintings". you would be close to blow them off the map in the event that they attack you. confident that's their purpose "Israel could desire to be thoroughly wiped out" plus the actuality that nukes do the main harm.... yeah Iran needs nukes to kill Israel. the possibility that they could have nukes in 10 years is intense, they probable have already got one if no longer quickly (as in interior of a twelve months).
2016-10-02 11:11:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
gen lee...lmfao
lets invade a country for acts they committed 25 years ago......lol
2007-03-05 15:07:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why aren't they a threat? Do you remember them taking U.S. hostages, I doubt it...
2007-03-05 14:57:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ACTS 4:12 4
·
1⤊
1⤋