English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could anybody help me with some evidence as to why World War I was not a modern war? Preferably have modern war defined as a war that utilized advanced techniques to increase progress in warfare.

2007-03-05 14:07:00 · 4 answers · asked by JSV 1 in Politics & Government Military

4 answers

World War One was the epitomy of Modern Warfare.

Look at the technologies used for the first time on the Battlefield;

Machinegun
Tank
Airplane
Submarine
Radio
Breechloading Cannons with recoil mechanisms
Forward Artillery Observers
High Explosive shells
Variable power telescopic sighted Sniper Rifles
Trucks
Tractors
the Parachute
Sonar
Long Range Artillery
Landing Craft
Motor Torpedo Boats
German Storm Trooper units invented the Fire & Manuever Tactics every modern Army uses to this day
Poison Gases
Flamethrowers
Mortar's
Hand Grenades

War footing of Industry

2007-03-05 14:23:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i can't help you.

the only place that WWI was not a modern war was in the minds of the generals that fought on both sides.

to the arms manufacturers krupp, schneider and armstrong vickers business had never been better and technology had never moved so swiftly.

there were many remarkable weapons introduced during WWI, including the big bertha, the paris cannon and the maxim machine gun and the tank.

WWI was the first conflict to use all of these new weapons.

the fact that general pershing still cluttered up his supply lines with fodder for useless horses only demonstrates what the reality of the agony of this war must have been for the fighting soldiers who were caught in the middle of this nightmarish killing machine while their generals toured the frontlines in rolls royces and scoffed at bad form - the brit commanders all seemed to agree that so many of the new officers weren't really gentlemen - and they meant it.

generals wanted to attack and defend based on tactics that they had learned at military academy, but the new technology demanded new tactics that took advantage of railroads, telegraph lines and the amazing new killing machines.

really the first modern war was the american civil war, or perhaps the franco prussian war of 1871.

WWI was definitely a modern war - 22 million people can't be killed using old fashioned methods...

2007-03-05 14:39:30 · answer #2 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1 0

Well, at the time it WAS a modern war. Many historians believe that the European countries that were involved did it so quickly because they had built up their military with all the modern weaponry at the time and wanted to use it. Tanks and planes, for example, were two things that were new to warfare then that we still use now.

2007-03-05 14:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the undertaking with it rather is that "modern-day" is a relative term. in the time of WW1, there replaced into plenty that replaced into modern-day. the business revolution replaced into finished steam and mass production replaced into booming. Tanks made their debute in WW1. Bio-war replaced into mass produced. yet while in comparison with as we talk, all of it rather is archaic, so which you fairly could desire to evaluate what time-physique you're in once you talk approximately something modern-day or no longer.

2016-09-30 06:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by kelchner 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers