English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read an article and unfortunately this appears to as real and true and your own car in front of you parked in your own driveway.


Two things

1) Don't you think the fares should be a lot less given this inconvience by invasion of privacy?

2) I'm very applaued by this. I don't think I wanna by on planes anymore is there gonna be going this far. Do you think this idea of boby scanning through clothes by x-rays is gonna make people fly a lot less? I for one won't be flying anymore.


A regular x-ray which shows someone's skeleton is one thing, but if it's the kind of x-ray where it shows what they're body looks like underneath, I think that's too much.

2007-03-05 12:35:38 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel Travel (General) Other - Destinations

4 answers

It is not an invasion of privacy. I think that you do not have the whole story. Here is the story for you.
In its endeavor to protect the nation's transportation infrastructure as well as the traveling public, TSA strives to provide both optimum security and maximum privacy protections to the traveling public.

TSA has been testing various technologies that may enhance security without diminishing the personal privacy of passengers at the security screening checkpoint. One of the technologies being tested is X-ray backscatter technology.

Backscatter will be able to detect non-metallic devices and objects, as well as weapons or other harmful objects that a passenger may be carrying on his or her person.

TSA has been working closely with the vendors to build individual privacy protections into the technology in addition to providing added security benefits.

2007-03-05 12:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by melanie m 2 · 1 0

relies upon at this type of X-Ray gadget getting used. At specific airports in Africa, Asia and S.usa, they use classic X-ray scanners which will reason some injury. frequently, digital camera-risk-free X-Ray machines will bear the legend "action picture risk-free". on account which you're wearing a digital camera, I dont think of it gets broken. even nevertheless, it may well be beneficial to get rid of the memory card, in case you utilize one, earlier putting the digital camera interior the scanner. memory taking part in cards, i replace into informed, are services to wreck by X-Ray.

2016-12-18 06:28:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I read about that, and it's in Phoenix, where I'm flying to in April!
I understand you have the choice of the superduper x-ray, or a pat down. Some decision, huh!

2007-03-05 12:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by Ara57 7 · 0 0

TSA is very interested in finding guns, bomb, or other weapon's. What they are not interested in is looking at your little winky

2007-03-05 13:07:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers