its a liberal plot to destroy christianity, next they will go after Islam
2007-03-05 12:30:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Samantha 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well seeing that even Atheist don't believe it... its was a sham! they went off the basis of a faulty if then logic. Their this is Jesus tomb he would be buried near his follwers... So they said well his follwers were buried in this area so this must be Jesus's tomb... also ignoring how common the name Jesus was at the time! I brushed it off as a hoax before I saw it, read the background info on it, and then watched it which just proved it was a hoax, along the lines of the Da Vinci Code, riding on it popularity to try and prove Jesus and Mary Magdelen were married and had kids... I wish people would let it go research Islam or something, see why so many of its followers are willing to kill themselves and others for a man the believe descended to heaven!
2007-03-05 21:42:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ms.jackson... 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The producer of this documentary also had a previous
documentary that turned out false. So, no way could
I believe this being Jesus bones. Jesus was not buried
in a box to begin with, He was encased in a cave, and
His body was gone (risen) 3 days later. No bones of
His will ever be found as the tomb was empty when
the cave seal was opened. Just as in America when
hundreds of people are named Mary, David, Joshua,
Michelle, etc., so was it in Jesus day. There were many
people with the name Jesus, Mary, Joseph, etc. So, the
documentary was a hoax, another liberal trying to
disprove Jesus was resurrected as the Bible states.
My religion is a Christian.
2007-03-05 20:40:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I watched part of it last night, and after so many "IF's" were stated, I couldn't take it anymore! What a FARCE! Anyone with a halfway intelligent mind could shoot holes in that B.S. all day long! But of course, people hear what they want to hear!
Ya know, the anti-Christian sect out there have been coming up with some brilliant discovery to debunk Christ right about this same time of year, (if you'll notice?), right before Easter. What's up with that!? Last year it was the DaVinci Code. The year before that, it was Jesus had sex with Mary Magdalene!
And ya know... people are so ignorant, and ill-informed, they fall for all this trash! Shows where our country is going, huh?
And tell me something... why isn't anyone trying as hard to debunk the Muslim religion, especially in times like these??? (They'd have alot more to go on - lotsa' B.S. there if anyone dared to investigate!!!)
2007-03-05 20:39:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by love_2b_curious 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Faith: Christian
I was in Jerusalem in 1999 and saw the two sites that are believed by scholars to be where Jesus was buried. (One possible site is where the Church of the Holy Sepulchre stands. The other possible site, called Golgotha, was identified by a British Army officer when the British occupied Palestine.) If yet a third possible burial site for Jesus was identified in 1980, how come we're just now hearing about it? Hmmmm?????? I don't lend much credence to the supposition that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had children by her (Show me some documentation of that.). Given his mission, what need would he have had for a wife and children?
To sum up, which I'd better do to avoid running off on a tangent, I think the claim of a newly discovered location for Jesus' tomb is GARBAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-06 00:11:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by allenbmeangene 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That "documentary" last night was very old news and deceptive... clearly another attempt to confuse the issue and just to make a buck for the ones producing it.... the documentation against what was presented is out there but not reported... The show that was on the disovery channel just befoe it was even worse... absolutly not acurate and streatching facts way beyond the breaking point... that one was about The Flood... really old and discredited stuff.... both shows very clearly anti Christian in nature and very biased....Personaly.... I knew all about what was claimed last niight long before I came to be of The True Christian Faith... and even then, when I was very much negative towards any thing "christian" , even I knew then that what was presented lastnight was bogus...
I am of The True Christian Faith... I am also a member of a small concervative Baptist congrigation which God led me to after I came to Him. nearly 7 yrs ago at the age of 53
2007-03-05 20:37:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by idahomike2 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Baptist/Christian
I think the "Tomb Discovery" is a crock of bull. My Savior is in Heaven...He died on the cross Friday, and He rose up on Sunday with ALL power in His hands. You will find NO bones belonging to anything on Jesus Christ...DNA evidence either or anything scientific for that matter because He is too Holy for all that and He Lives! Science does not even compete with God's Holiness. He's so powerful that He defies logic...It's amazing what crap people come up with to make themselves look good. I really don't know how people like that can sleep at night...
And I'm yet praying for that idiot who is blaspheming my Savior...
2007-03-05 20:46:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by IB_08 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm a Christian, and it isn't what I think about your question ...it's that the site was discovered, and rejected as a tomb for a carpenter back in nineteen eighty. The mockumentory is a sham.
These two points are facts, not personal opinions.
2007-03-05 20:42:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by the old dog 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
non-denominational christian
it is just another in a parade of hoaxes meant to discredit the claim that Jesus was resurrected. the tomb was discovered 20 years ago, why make the claim now? because the book/movie "davinci code" as a piece of FICTION laid the foundation for more hoaxes of this nature to follow.
2007-03-05 20:35:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by prismcat38 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Atheist
It's a genuine tomb, with genuine ossuaries.
It's not the same Jesus that founded the philosophy that Paul later codified into Christianity.
2007-03-05 20:29:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
An attempt to make money by bringing up a 20 year old discovery and saying that it threatens the basis of a world religion.
Reformed Presbyterian.
2007-03-05 20:33:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by Tim 6
·
3⤊
1⤋