English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Its great.

2007-03-05 12:30:13 · answer #1 · answered by L3monDr0p 4 · 0 0

i think of each and each time you inject a miles off places substance right into a individual's physique you are able to desire to weigh the pros and cons and make an recommended determination. i does not permit my daughter have the HPV vaccine seeing it particularly is in simple terms too new and we don't understand the achievable side outcomes till it particularly is been utilized in a extensive inhabitants. i don't think of a woman does not have intercourse because of the fact she is irritating approximately maximum cancers. i think of her considerable hardship may well be the two getting caught or getting pregnant with a small few irritating approximately ailment. maximum babies have a attitude that not something undesirable will ever take place to them. besides, I digress, we are only discovering now concerning to the relationship between vaccines and autism. Why might you prefer to risk unknown problems devoid of provocation? If a woman is already sexually lively or pondering taken her relationship to the sexual point i will see how using the vaccine may well be warranted yet wanting that, i don't think of it particularly is properly well worth the unknown risk.

2016-12-18 06:28:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't have a daughter, but if I did, I'd be sure she got it. Why in the world would I risk her getting something that I could help her prevent? If I didn't get it for her, how would I feel if she were to be diagnosed with cervical cancer, knowing I could have prevented it? There's no way a daughter of mine would go without it.

If it were some sort of vaccine for my son that would prevent something as serious as cancer - ANY cancer - you can bet he'd be at the doctor the DAY it was available.

2007-03-05 12:28:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This vaccine is a good idea but I dont believe that it should be MANDATORY. People have to take responsibilty and not expect the government to tell tham what to do. First mandatory vaccine for hpv, then what will become MANDATORY next? Big Brother watches enough as it is.

2007-03-05 14:48:06 · answer #4 · answered by prancylou 2 · 1 1

It should be offered to ALL women, not just girls between certain ages. It's not right.

Lawmakers should not make it a requirement for all young girls to get the shot. Not everyone could take the shot. It should be on a voluntary basis like the flu shots.

2007-03-05 12:27:31 · answer #5 · answered by Nancy 6 · 1 0

I think it's great! A young girl doesn't have to be a sleep around but if she becomes involved with someone, there is no telling who they have been with in the past so why chance anything.

2007-03-05 12:28:27 · answer #6 · answered by Lina D 2 · 1 0

althou I feel that it is Great that they have found a form of protection from the hpv I do feel that it is still a little to early to be forcing familys to give it to there daughters

2007-03-05 13:19:58 · answer #7 · answered by mkys 2 · 0 0

i think it is great and that any women should get the hpv vaccine but only if they want it.

2007-03-05 12:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Go head, we need more protection. Help us woman live longer.

2007-03-05 12:30:02 · answer #9 · answered by Dat_Ny_Chick 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers