Eastern & western religion ,were according to area what should be the religion of present global villege?

Question

All these different religions were right when people use to live in a cult & did not meet other religions & did not know about the other religions. As Krishna said "come to me I will give you peace". Islam says " non islamics will go to hell" Christaians say "Jesus is the only God". Theory should be a theory which will be universally acceptable. Because all these religions do not conside at a point.If Scientifically Human being is one its creator has to be one. Should be a global religion which can be accepted by everyone in this global villege. Where in the morning you are in Dubai & in the evening you are in Canada or in the afternoon you are in India . Because if one God gives us peace then what will happen to the other religion people? Will they be ghost? A universaly raccepted religion & only one God". For this global villege.

Answer 1

Usually wrong meaning of religion is taken everywhere.
Religion means to realise "Paramaatmaa"(God) (the truth) individually within. The condition and conduct within with pure heart is same in all human beings apart from any place, cast or country. That is why it is called one God and one religion. There couldn't be any alternate reason. By "Vishw Paramaatmaa Parivaar Dharm"

Answer 2

I'm not sure if i'm particularly best placed to give an answer to this question being an aethiest and (nominally at least) a scientist, but i was interested by your introduction of science to a qustion of theology - the culmination being the question of what the 'ultimate truth' should be - how one can meld so many disparate 'theories' (watch out here come the heritic bashers) / beliefs into a simple understandable idea.

You will have to excuse me for going off at a tangent here - towards science.

The funny thing is that as probably people can explain and understand much better than me, Science - in the case i'm thinking of especially physics - has a so - far un-resolvable problem resolving the dichotomy - if thats the word im reaching for between the quantum world and the macroscopic world we know - both of which to some extent are understood in their own right.

Some scientists hold out for the great next leap that will be able to meld these disparate theories. However most seem to figure that if it is ever solved it probably will not be solved soon - and probably not in the most obvious way - therefore it is probably more rewarding to work in small ways integrating the differences between more solvable problems and working towards the 'ultmate truth' rather than trying to tackle it all at once. It is perfectly possible to use different sets of rules to approximate work in different realms/scales - even if they actually occupy the same space.

This is at least a passible analogy for my morality - i dont particularly believe in any god(s), but i dont see why it isnt possible if their is a/are god(s) - that one interpretation cant work just as well as another down the street from another. After all conflicts and politics are sustaned by people not interpretations. I understand that this isnt really an answer - just a way of looking at things and moving along, however, it seems that the solution - rather like the words of 'God', Jesus, Mohammed, Confussious, Sidartha, et al. or the more conceptual 'book' Erdos and Einstien spoke of are for the moment and possibly for ever much beyond the understanding of ourselves.

Answer 3

to be part of every religion, enjoy each festival of every religion.