whoz better michelangelo or leonardo da vinci? and why?

Question

i have a 1 page essay so if u guys can help me a little...thnx

Answer 1

I study Renaissance art and I don't think you can say one was better than the other as they were so different. When you study people like this in great depth you almost feel as if you know them and you get a feel of what their personality may have been like.

In the art stakes they were both superb. I've been lucky enough to handle and view some of their work personally and they were both extremely talented artists. Michelangelo's genius lay in his ability in sculpture whereas Leonardo's genius lay in the fields of anatomy, science and technology. Michelangelo worked hard at his comissions, Leonardo worked hard for his own gratification.

I personally like Leonardo best as his love of animals, bitchiness, superb dress sense and capability as a polymath appeals to me.

I respect Michelangelo greatly but he was always a bit too tortured for my liking. Plus he hated Leonardo!

Never forget though that each bought something very special and highly important to the Renaissance, as did many other artists and that they were both equally important in this sense

Answer 2

As an artist I provide it to Michelangelo. Leonardo da Vinci replaced into an inventor, visionary, scientist and numerous different issues. He knew extra relating to the human physique than maximum docs of the era so i might could desire to declare in common genius he replaced into extra advantageous.

Answer 3

leonardo da vinci caus e kud du stuff reel guud!

Answer 4

it's in the eye of the viewer . something sooo subjective as can't be compared this way . peroid , done by-by so long . tp. mullin