If so, could you please give some examples. Thank you.
2007-03-05 05:13:24 · 27 answers · asked by Shirley 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, except where science is wrong. Sorry to tell you that so-called science is based on faulty foundations and assumptions. When this happens, a contradiction appears, but it is because science is wrong. We have seen many examples of this over the years. The best example I can think of is leading evolutionists agree that evolution is impossible, but it is the only alternative to the creation that God tells us about in the Bible.
2007-03-05 05:18:53 · answer #1 · answered by Rick 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
not all Scientist favor all theories that's why they continue on researches. And if they found one great discovery, they only reveal the Glory that the Creator is awesome. Finding artifacts to disprove the Bible is non-sense. They wont speed-up internet connection.
So therefore, Science is a study to make Technology that would ease Human living, not to contradict supernatural Philisophies.
Science is a physical study. Bible is more on spiritual. Thats why Intelligent design was dedenouced.
they're in different area dude. Don't Combine 1, 2, 3 with Red, Green, Blue.
2007-03-05 13:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by theSeed 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are passages in the Bible which are scientifically inaccurate:
Rabbits and hyrax do not chew their cud.
Insects do not have four legs.
Bats are not birds.
Cows do not give birth to striped calves if they observe a striped pole while pregnant.
And many, many more.
However, science does not contradict the actual _message_ of the Bible.
If you try to use the Bible as a science textbook, you may have some difficulties, but as a spiritual guide and text of salvation, it seems to work just fine for a lot of people.
2007-03-05 13:24:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it contradicts the bible. People just have to realize the limitations of science. I believe that the bible fills in the gaps of science. The problem is that people calculate & guess in science. Their results are used as weapons to attack the bible.
They like to say that evolution began with an explosion, but it was simply God. They say that proteins mixed together with just the right ingredients created man, but God created man. They say that Man evolved from a monkey (which I wouldn't even be proud to boast of) just because of a 3% difference in the DNA of each, but God created both (separately).
To approve of this, allows one to think that life came by accident and we don't actually have a purpose here but to get what we can before we die. It also means that no one should be mourning the death of a human because that human was only a shell because they were only born to live and die.
The bible adds purpose to man and his existence on earth.
Good question...
2007-03-05 13:37:14 · answer #4 · answered by se-ke 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sometimes does and it sometimes doesn't. Okay, there's the theory of evolution which I believ is just bs since we are created in the image of God. There's also the fact that Scientists beleive that the world was made over billions of years when the Bible says that God created it only like 4000 to 6000 years ago. However there are sometimes when science doesn't contradict the Bible like the fact that there are trees outside and animals and nature is just awesome!
2007-03-05 13:20:01 · answer #5 · answered by sYnDiA 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. see link below.
A teaser for those of you that are not willing to take a look:
- The Bible says that there are more stars that the sand of the sea shore. For 1800 years this was stated to be proof that the Bible was wrong because before telescopes the stars that could be seen could be counted (we can see approximately 2000 stars with the unaided eye). Now that we have the telescope, science has proved that the bible was right.
To J.P. below. Oh come now ... not one? Judge for yourself people. Tell you what, I will ask a question and you can answer it.
2007-03-05 13:16:28 · answer #6 · answered by Craig 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Certainly there are some examples of science contradicting at least some interpretations of the Bible.
For example, the story of Adam and Eve and even creation in general is mostly contradicted by evolution.
In addition, there is no support for a world-wide flood.
Pi is not equal to 3.
There is also no evidence of God.
2007-03-05 13:18:35 · answer #7 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Remember this NOTHING can contradict the Bible or you can't contradict the Bible. It's impossible!!! If you can contradict Romans 10:9-10
2007-03-05 13:17:35 · answer #8 · answered by ogre_110 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is no geological evidence to support any "flood" myth concerning the entire planet being flooded at the same time...
And, ummm... Rick (below): what "leading evolutionists" agree that Evolution is impossible? Last time I checked, the scientific community was in agreement with Evolution, excepting solely a small group of pseudo-scientists.
2007-03-05 13:17:46 · answer #9 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello,
Check here http://bitly.com/1ub1hla if you want to get for free: Broken Sword Return of the Templars
With this link you can get the full version completely free.
The story is based on the ancient order of Templar Knights and their dark secrets.
It's a really nice game.
2014-08-31 04:19:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's start simple. Modern science thinks that the bat is a mammal, the bible says it's a type of bird.
2007-03-05 13:17:35 · answer #11 · answered by Dave P 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋