2007-03-05 04:02:59 · 32 answers · asked by ? 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I am a believer!
I believe what the bible stated than what people pronounce.
That tomb that they claimed to be “the tomb of Christ” it is actually indicated that Satan is working:
2007-03-05 20:25:12 · answer #1 · answered by yana 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean a tomb. There is no proof, however scanty that the tomb is Jusus'. It has been known for many years. No one thought it to be of any great importance. Now some sharpies smell a buck - - - so all of a sudden this old burial place becomes the tomb of Jesus
These things have been going on since the beginning of time, and will still be going on long after we're all gone.
2007-03-05 04:11:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bible says that Jesus was buried in a borrowed tomb, so, the body must belong to the owner. There is one thing for sure, it is not Jesus' body, it was resurrected. It is documented that He was seen by over 500 and visited His followers for several days, and was it was witnessed by His Disciples of His Ascension up towards heaven. Two angel said unto them" Why stare ye up, this same Jesus will return in same manner". I'm setting here waiting on Him.
2007-03-05 04:13:30 · answer #3 · answered by Auburn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would indicate that the person making the claim, "this is the tomb of Jesus" had done some deeply flawed investigation, probably motivated to receive their 15 minutes of fame.
2007-03-05 04:09:40 · answer #4 · answered by lda 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well it would mean that he didn't ascend bodily into heaven. In this case it would also mean that he was married and had a son. There also could be other children since there were several unmarked coffins and no DNA done, but it could be. That would make the writer of Holy Blood, Holy Grail look pretty damn smart.
Again, I don't think it is a great case. But it wasn't horrible either.
2007-03-05 04:10:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would indicate its possible to find a decayed body intact.
2007-03-05 04:09:05 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would indicate that rather than rising from the dead, as the Bible asserts, Jesus never rose again.
While I am an unbeliever and would love to have such proof as this, I think that it is highly unlikely that it can be PROVEN that these bones are his. It is up to those who believe that these are the bones of Jesus of Nazareth to provide the proof of such, and I don't expect such proof to be forthcoming.
.
2007-03-05 04:11:49 · answer #7 · answered by Weird Darryl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were no bones. This is the same tomb 'discovered' 27 yrs ago. This guy Cameron is a fraud....just out to make a buck.
"Like The Da Vinci Code, it is the simple desire to shock even when the argument is breathtakingly literalistic, ludicrous and superstitious."
2007-03-05 04:10:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That a literal interpretation of the resurrection and ascension is incorrect.
The body must have remained while Jesus ascended spiritually.
And that Jesus definitely actually existed.
2007-03-05 04:14:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
(BIG) If the tomb of Jesus Christ was found, it would indicate that he did not physically rise to heaven, which is what most Christians believe.
2007-03-05 04:07:59 · answer #10 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋