2007-03-05 03:16:10 · 5 answers · asked by John H 1 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Other - Outdoor Recreation
Well, the genuine TT33 was Russian, however many other Soviet-bolc countries made this gun, so you need to clarify which one you have, and it's condition is paramount in establishing value.
From Surplusrifle.com website:
"Fedor Vasilevich Tokarev developed the TT-30 Pistol for the Soviet Military. The TT-33 (Tokarev-Tula) adopted in 1933, an improved design over the TT-30, was widely used by Soviet troops during WWII.
A very close, less polished facsimile of John Browning's 1911 automatic pistol in design and function with a much simpler hammer/sear assembly.
Production of the TT-33 in the USSR stopped in 1954. Also made by China as the Type 51, Type 54, and M20, Hungary as the 48 M, Egypt as the Tokagypt 58, North Korean as the Type 68. At one time or another most communist or Soviet block countries made a variation of the TT-33 pistol."
Russian examples early production, excellent condition are getting $500+, however these are very rare.
Later Russians are getting around $300-$375, Polish and Chinese are around $250-$300.
Romanians are just beijng imported and can be had at some distributors for $239 wholesale like $300 retail....word is these are rough looking and there was a safety added to meet US requirements that was not very well engineered.
2007-03-05 05:05:17 · answer #1 · answered by DJ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it's in excellent like new shape, possibly close to $300.00+-. The price goes down according to condition. Their value depends on how bad somebody wants that particular pistol. They were plentiful years ago and are bought to be shot, not as a collector's item. If it's average condition, $150.00-$200.00 for TT-33 models and 50% more fore the model TT-30. They are well made rip-off copies of the Browning 1911 govt. model.
2007-03-05 05:30:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. *lol* I'm pretty sure I'm ugly enough to break the camera on that one--at least that's what people tell me. ^_^ Bonus: the magazine doesn't exist yet. No, I wouldn't pose nude for National Geographic. *lol* And as for any pics I would _take_ from the other side of the camera (of someone else), like I just said, the magazine doesn't _exist_ yet that covers my specific swoony things. Seriously. I'm strange that way. ^_^
2016-03-29 00:50:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1
2017-02-08 22:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
about $150
2007-03-05 03:21:53 · answer #5 · answered by grantwiscour 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋