Just see their current main news
http://www.yahoo.com/s/522593
2007-03-05 03:12:09 · 13 answers · asked by Born again atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They contradicted the theory that earth is 6000 years old
2007-03-05 03:28:26 · update #1
no, they just try to get suckers like you logging onto their website, so they can remain popular.
2007-03-05 03:15:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i'm rather particular a lot of them are, it truly is a touch too glaring. yet obviously, some human beings can truly amaze you even as it includes faith(properly particularly no longer in reality faith, almost each little thing). So i wager a number of them may be the genuine deal. And that scares me a touch. Ecter: i'm an atheist and that i believe you. yet, because atheists spot trolls posing as atheists so as that they don't supply the genuine atheists a nasty rep, shouldn't the Christians spot the trolls posing to be fundies?
2016-12-05 06:40:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So? Even "fundies" as you put it (I am not) believe in micro-evolution. It didn't change from a horned dinosaur to a housefly! Just to a different horned dinosaur! I don't think that Yahoo is an Atheist organization, but I don't think they're religious either. Neutral. They're basically Swiss.
2007-03-05 03:21:30 · answer #3 · answered by girlpreacher 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Quite funny really! And quite telling to. Notice on the first line after the comma, "suggesting an evolutionary middle step".
Isn't all the so-called, evidence of evolution a "suggestion?"
The more advanced we become, the less evidence we need to prove something ! Go figure that one.
2007-03-05 03:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
At last check, their main story was about Iraq, and the dinosaur story was toward the bottom. They feed their news straight off the press wires, without any editing or alteration.
2007-03-05 03:17:44 · answer #5 · answered by milomax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I noticed that, first of all it looks like a Triceratops, and second I am willing to bet they have no evidence that it "evolved" from smaller to bigger.
I mean come on, just because one person has a larger penis than another doesn't mean the smaller penis evolved into the larger one.
2007-03-05 03:16:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't they call Scooby Doo and Batman underwear Fundies?
2007-03-05 03:17:47 · answer #7 · answered by billthakat 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How would that make them an Atheist organisation
2007-03-05 03:16:38 · answer #8 · answered by Krayden 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love the 'deny, deny, deny' answers.
2007-03-05 03:32:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it's the female. GOD BLESS
2007-03-05 03:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by TCC Revolution 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋