against or agree with reproductive technology
2007-03-05 02:36:08 · 7 answers · asked by sean_persaud_26 1 in Environment
I really think it depends on the level of technology. Personally, my husband and I face some challenges because I have an abnormal reproductive system. I may or may not be able to carry a child, and minor surgery could correct the problem if I can not. My medical condition is not hereditary. However, I feel that there are many many children in this world in need of loving parents. My husband and I have discussed our situation and have decided that, if we can't have children without a great deal of medical procedures, we'd much prefer to spend the money on adopting a child than trying to have one of our own. Love makes an adopted child your own, not genetics. Some people don't feel the same way. If we try a couple times and fail, we have already agreed on adoption. There are so many children in this world in need of loving families, I'm not ready to discriminate over genes.
2007-03-05 02:49:07 · answer #1 · answered by Ida B. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not much in favor of it. If people can't conceive children of their own, they should adopt - I know there seems to be a shortage of fresh from the womb perfect babis so they should look into adopting the older more difficult to adopt children who are basically being raised 'in the system' or consider foreign adoption.
What really irritates me is the women who go this route and end up giving birth to a litter rather than one child (or twins) and say it was 'God's plan' - if it was 'God's plan, they would not have needed the intervention of the medical community to get pregnant in the first place! And the saddest part is when these women do have litters, they are inundated with freebies from corporations, etc. If they could afford the fertility treatment, they should be able to afford their needs. If they didn't have the foresight to set aside money for their needs after the baby(s) were born, then sucks to be them since there are so many women who conceived naturally and can barely afford to survive and no one's giving them big huge corporate handouts (including vehicles, houses, etc.).
2007-03-05 02:47:18 · answer #2 · answered by Sunidaze 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Against. I do not have a child yet. I believe that in todays world using the resources this way is the ultimate act of selfish arrogance.With so many children out there needing love,food and guidance I will adopt if I can't make babies naturally with a future mate.
2007-03-05 02:50:18 · answer #3 · answered by canadaguy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A rather vague question. The answer depends on what topic in "reproductive technology". Abortion, birth control, stem cell research, IV fertilization, horomone replacement therapy, cloning, etc. Or are you talking about natural sexual activity?
Pick something specific.
2007-03-05 02:44:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i imagine it truly is large. there are such truly some women individuals available having issues getting pregnant. a huge area of those women individuals (jointly with myself) can be a good mom, yet are only having a touch problems with it on our own. This technologies lets the final public of girls individuals with fertility issues stay their dream of fixing into mommies.
2016-12-05 06:39:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i disagree with it....if u or spouse cannot reproduce it's natures way of weeding out the weak. there are plenty of children that need families and need to be loved....adopt or don't have children period.
2007-03-05 02:39:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think it's great for the couple that can't have a baby on their own
2007-03-05 02:38:08 · answer #7 · answered by i totally agree with you!! not 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋