Sadist nutters at that. And the only parts that would have any literary equivalence to Dante would be some of the Psalms & a bit of what's attributed to Solomon.
And to the person who doesn't like "nutters:" Who died and left you in charge of the lexicon? Give it a rest.
2007-03-05 02:32:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by JAT 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Entirely likely.
I wouldn't even rate it if it was billed as a book of short stories.
And yes, I've read it.
All of it.
Unfortunately.
It's the ones who win the wars that write the history books!
Oh, and I like the word 'nutters' Very eloquent.
2007-03-05 02:41:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Up-side-down 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think so, yes. But, I also believe that the writers of the Bible were victims of the time period that they lived in- looking for answers to the universe to which they didn't have the technology to answer yet.
I do believe certain individuals really existed, like Moses and Jesus, and that they were good, influential individuals. I just think that perhaps some of the details were Strrrrrreeeeccchhheeeed.
2007-03-05 02:32:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Not so looney afterall 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, Dante had more talent.
I think we should adopt the word nutters into the American lexicon, I like it.
2007-03-05 02:35:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Murazor 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Anything meaningless is quickly forgotten. Regardless of whether the bible is literally true or not, if it's been around this long, God must have some purpose or meaning behind it.
2007-03-05 02:31:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i just want to know why athiests call Christians crazy. you guys are the ones fighting so hard against something you dont believe in.
2007-03-05 02:37:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mace Face 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it is not likely at all.
If you are in the United States, please "speak" accordingly.
We do not use the term "nutters" here.
2007-03-05 02:28:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No
2007-03-05 02:47:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by thankyou "iana" 6
·
0⤊
0⤋