Teaching intelligent design has been ruled unconstitutional. What will be Creationists next strategy?

Question

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

In December 2005, Judge John E. Jones ruled that teaching Intelligent Design was teaching a religious doctrine and therefore violates the constitutional ban on the state establishment of religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District

Now that Intelligent Design can no longer constitutionally be taught in public schools, what will be Creationists next strategy to counter the teaching of evolution?

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

Answer 1

They will do what they always do when their lies fail. Spew venom and create a fall back lie. When evolution hadn't been observed happening, they said it hadn't been proven. When it had been observed, they went to the modified untruth claiming it was only "micro-evolution", and that it couldn't result in "macro-evolution", despite the absence of a mechanism to halt it. They said new species don't evolve. When speciation was observed, they said they meant genus. (Many say they would believe it only when some thing transformed Kingdoms.) Most of the biological systems they called "irreducibly complex" have been shown not to be. Enough losses there, and they claim scientists have disproven Intelligent Micro-design, but not Intelligent Macro-design. Of course, at the crux of the problem, ID isn't science.

Answer 2

the main recent identity push is to "instruct the debate," and component to that application is a instructors handbook packed with the time-honored identity BS. It does not present day any thought, basically those comparable drained arguments. I could desire to upload after analyzing some posts: Creationism taught as component to a faith type i'm fantastic with, yet when I pay attention clever layout, i be responsive to the motives of identity proponents attempt to get Creationism taught specifically as technology. properly, certainly they are basically attempting to make evolution sound controversial, as a precursor to introducing the Christian god, alongside the "If there's a advent, there could desire to be a writer, and that writer is God, now permit's open our Bibles," line. yet, of direction, they are concentrated on youngsters, no longer college scholars, because of the fact someplace around 15 we're not almost as liable to easily accepting what authority figures let us know, and are exceedingly good serious thinkers. The very thought that identity is promoted as a thought, yet has no theoretical scientific care (the written record which states the assumption), nor any evidence or attractiveness interior the medical field, and is even seen for coaching is thoughts-blowing.

Answer 3

Fire the existing judges and replace them with judges who are eager to put their religion ahead of their country. Check out the news - it's happening already.

If we're forced to teach "intelligent design", teachers would be justified in just saying "Kids, take a free hour. We're not going to learn anything, so just get an hour of sleep, okay?".

The creationists don't ever seem to wonder why their organizations are so eager to censor science teaching. If creationism is so reasonable, why are the creationists so afraid of science challenging it?

Answer 4

"If any cultures are going to be taught about in school, then the religious cultures must be taught as well. No more Spanish class without specialized religion classes, i.e. a specific course in Christianity (and Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, etc. if we must be fair)."

Then they can teach their whacked-out, wannabe "science".

Answer 5

I think Christians will continue to push Intelligent design and it may some day be over ruled. I mean look at the world and ask your self, how could something this perfect run on it's own with out major catastrophe??? Gods hand is in it, and it was from the start. Evilution will never be able to explain the spiritual aspect, they just make up different excuses...with out proof mind you... and their facts are just as foggy and blurry as some people say the bible is. I mean come on! On the WHOLE planet we were the ONLY ones to actually acquire intelligents ??? What are we mutants???

p.s. Evilution takes faith too. A bag of bones that may look something like a person doesn't prove a damn thing to me.

Answer 6

The ruling only applies to where that particular court has juristiction and no where else. When the US Supreme Court renders a decision on this....and as far as I know no case has gone that far yet, come back and we'll talk.

Answer 7

Flooding into the streets and screaming "Death to evolution!!!" Then the explosive vests will be passed out.

Oh... wait... dangit, I got confused again.

Answer 8

I still teach it ....especially here on the internet....try to stop me...Ha, ha, ha..
Thanks for letting me know you can't handle it.

I'm glad teaching the truth STILL upsets you....


"We must obey God rather than man".

Answer 9

nothing they can do