practically Israel lost the 33 Day war with a very small ( Gang )
I think Israel should seek peace now better than later, in the other hand Israel will have to back up and leave, ( for Ahmady Najad ),I think as Israeli supporter we are in a big trouble.
2007-03-04 21:39:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The geographical area of founding Israel was not in a suitable location although as per the Israelis, it is the divine Promised Land for them. However, it would be wise and good for the Jewish people if they could make the Israel in some part of the huge America or Australia. It is not wise to make a home surrounded by the ever red eyed enemies. How long the US and UK would support Israel for its existence? Who knows how long the US itself would remain as the US of today?
However, as Israel was formed with the intention of making a ‘homeland’ for the stray Jewish community in the world, eventually, it became a place of the Jewish people from different countries with different cultures and different languages. Nevertheless, most of the investments, assets and businesses of the Jewish community are not in Israel. They are just happy to get a homeland for them but not to be staying or settling there confidently (as they know very well that Israel is not their land and they can be kicked out to be stray again at any time with the change of the world politics).
However, I believe that it is not Iran or Ahmedinezad who would end up the existence of Israel. The drama of the ‘Israel fantasy’ would be ended up by the USA and the UK themselves when they would experience that it is no more cost-effective and prudent to support Israel any more.
2007-03-04 22:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by The Falcon 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You reason wrongly
Iran only has superior numbers in soldiers, but no real method of bringing them to the battlefield. They have practically no navy, no air force to speak of, some chinese make believe tanks- and that's it. Sure, they also manufacture some missles- which were so innacurate they had problems with hitting a city sized target.
Israel has none of these problems. They have plenty of long range precision weaponry and the will to use it. And after all, Israel is technically at war with Iran already- and one enemy more or less is not something that'll make any difference in Israels military situation.
The problem facing Iran in a war is a bit complex- they could move their men into Lebanon for an attack, but that would mean the mullahs would be left without bodyguards to keep the Iranian people in line- after all, face it: the only reason for Iran's "official hatred" against Israel and US is their need to have an enemy as justification for keeping the mad mullahs in power. For it is impossible to believe that a mullah who does not care about the lives of his own people gets so moved by the "plight of the palestinians" in Israel (but of course not so "moved" as to grant them- even temporarily- land to live safely in Iran).
What would happen if a "hot" war breaks out? In the short term the anihilation of Iranian economy- what's left of it- and of their nuclear plants. In the long run, the anihilation of the mad mullah regime- to the cheers of the Iranian people and the muslim neighbours of Iran.
2007-03-05 06:20:49 · answer #2 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Are you even serious? Israel will turn iran into a parking lot, period. Israel's air power is second to the US and perhaps China. If iran is stupid enough to initiate all out war with Israel, they will learn the hard way what all-out war is about.
2007-03-05 05:46:00 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan _ 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Israel crumbled against Hezbollah in a week confrontation, Iran is a foe they fear the most, that's why they are paying AIPAC billion of dollars to "force" US in a war with Iran for them.
2007-03-05 05:44:16 · answer #4 · answered by YupChubby 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
israel has nukes, this is why they will remain there for the foreseeable future, i think even the radical jihadists dont want the fallout of nuclear war.
is this is why there is such tension about iran having nukes?
anyway even in conventional war - israel is packing some serious gear.
But i guess if alone, with no nukes and an extended war iran could win.
2007-03-05 05:47:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I say no more wars for Israel.
2007-03-05 05:43:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You mean the second Lebanon war?
We weren't fighting a country, and we had an incompetent Rav Aluf and defence minister, but we're changing all that.
And yes, we'd be able to stand up to Iran.
2007-03-05 05:45:50 · answer #7 · answered by Tanktunker 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
they have been fighting for over 2,000 years for that piece of turf
the country that does NOT support Israel will be in big trouble
if you remember, they were attacked on the Sabbath
They could take care of Iran in a week.
2007-03-05 05:45:05 · answer #8 · answered by tomkat1528 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Maybe yes maybe not but remember the U.S.A. gave Israel a atomic bomb plant in 1959 buried in their desert and they like America will use it for their power and control if they think they can get away with it.
2007-03-05 05:44:56 · answer #9 · answered by trailertrashsucks 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
yes because they are backed by us. giving them an almost unlimited supply of weapons.
2007-03-05 06:06:55 · answer #10 · answered by joe blow 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋