Why America and U.K doesnot destroy there own Nuclear Weapons and then ask Iran to stop making Nuclear bomb.
2007-03-04 21:33:37 · 15 answers · asked by maki" The time begins Now 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
common sense, sir. How could these group of 10 or so superpower can push their agenda for world control to form one world government if any nation resists them through nuclear weapo n?
2007-03-04 21:43:48 · answer #1 · answered by wilma m 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
For one thing, we have no idea if they are making a bomb or not, they do have soem legitamate concerns on how to meet their countries increasing demands for energy and what they will do without oil.
Besides that, if Iran had a nuclear bomb they would have the capacity to rule the middle east and cause great damage, potentially.
If Iran didnt have a supreme leader that has nearly absolute power over the republic, it could have been ok, maybe.
2007-03-06 20:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by LmaoCow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Iran signed a treaty called the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which bans the development of nuclear weapons. The quid pro quo with the existing nuclear powers is that RUssia, US, France, Britain and China have to provide assistance to the other countries in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
And Iran is talking about wiping Israel off the map. Letting Iran develop the bomb is like selling an axe to a man who mutters under his breath about chopping up his wife
2007-03-05 05:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by Mardy 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
At this point, with so many nations having nuclear capability, unilateral nuclear disarmament to negotiate with Iran is unthinkable. Iran doesn't have an impressive record of peaceful resolution to political problems. I am not so afraid that Iran will use these weapons against Israel. I think Israel would make light work of the Iranian threat by the Walls of Jericho/into oblivion resolution. What scares me is that Iran might hold the world at bay in considering Iranian demands due to the nuclear threat. It is clearly the policy of the "industrialized nations" to keep nukes out of the hands of the independent oil producing/competing nations of the middle east to maintain some semblance of balance of power in this hotbed of political unrest.
2007-03-05 06:32:15 · answer #4 · answered by Rudy R 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Those countries have proven they are responsible members of the world community and their nuclear weapons will not be used inappropriately. Iran's theocracy is anything but.
2007-03-05 08:46:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Susi, China India and Pakistan are considered third world countries, yes they are newly industrialised countries but have not attained status as a first world country yet and they are all nuclear powers
2007-03-05 06:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by mary 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Iran is considered a third world country and a bomb in the hands of such fanatics might be devastating!!!!!
2007-03-05 05:57:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
they want to stop iran,s progress.
2007-03-06 02:29:44 · answer #8 · answered by margemoosh 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
fr33d0m09 you say Its because Iran will use them but are you forgetting US has already used them twice before.
2007-03-05 05:48:10 · answer #9 · answered by bill 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
It's probably "Jewish Paranoia"...
Jews think anyone with Nukes will speedup doomsday and hence the elimination of ISRAEL and force convering them to PROTESTANISM :D
Neat anecdote eh?
2007-03-05 05:40:06 · answer #10 · answered by YupChubby 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋