Should the US govt insist that Iraqi PM Maliki dismiss all ministers sympathetic to the cleric al-Sadr?

Question

I mean what's up with that. This guy wants to kill US soldiers, he is sympathetic with Iran and meets regularly and hides there too. Should we withdraw support to al-Maliki unless the Iraqis get rid of that wannabe Iranian traitor in their midst ?

Answer 1

We can insist all we want. They shouldn't have to do it, however.

Al-Maliki does need to take a serious look at that, however. Sadr is trying to over throw his government and he doesn't even see it.

Personally, I think we should have killed him when we had the chance.

Answer 2

I think you are confused. Maliki is a Shia. Al Sadr is a Shia. Al Sadr's followers supported Maliki. Many of Al Sadr's sympathizers are in the Iraqi Cabinet. If Al Sadr withdrew his support of Maliki, Maliki's government would collapse in a week. It is because of Al Sadr's influence that Maliki can hold on to power. Without Al Sadr's support, Maliki wouldn't have won the Iraqi elections. It was actually the U.S.'s mistake. When the U.S. was pondering on choosing which dog to support, it placed its bets on Maliki, the wrong dog. Had the U.S. chose to support Chalabi, things would be so different than it is now.

Al Sadr is truly a crazy religious fanatic. He was the one who started the whole sectarian conflict. He should have been stopped long ago, but Maliki wouldn't dare do that. Maliki knows that Al Sadr's demise will lead to his own downfall. Maliki is a puppet. Both Al Sadr and the U.S. are the puppet masters.

Answer 3

Absolutely not. Al Sadr is part of the Shiite majority. He was cooperating with us by taking the Mahdi army off the streets....and then the Sunnis bombed a university. Personally, even though he's bad news, I think the Iraqis are safer with guys like him around. He's in a position to do alot of good for his people...lets hope he takes the high road.

Answer 4

Legitimacy is based on the consent of the governed. If we let the Iraqis elect their own government then we have to accept the possibility that they'll elect someone we don't like. By trying to wipe out their decision, we're only making it even less likely that the next government we allow them to elect will be able to hold power.

Answer 5

If we do, then it is a puppet government...Let's let them have their country in 1 year...if our government tells the Iraq government this in private...to give them one last chance to develop a military and police...gees they have had 4 years now.

Answer 6

those who merely get their information from the first six minute soundbites might want to continually submit to in ideas that there are 2 aspects to each and each tale and in case your to lazy to get the different aspects view then you definately will continually stay ignorant. i wanted to submit this genuine speedy and then i visit bypass get my source and record it decrease back to you, yet in a unmarried of President Bush's speeches he suggested we are able to leave Iraq even as they ask us to. And assuming they're soveriegn and Maliki isn't corrupt we are able to bypass. And in case no man or woman checked the different part, the merely accurate of the troops from the surge are on their way homestead. That project done. Iraq is conscious of finished properly Iran is licking this is chops waiting to get in there, although the Iraqi's are not any more going to allow it ensue. and they opt for help for today.yet in the journey that they opt for us out in spite of takes position, takes position. Bush is a guy of his note and if the Iraqi people opt for us out i think we are able to bypass right now. via the way are not we people today debating our dependence on foriegn oil? are not we debating drilling our own. What sense does it make to stay for the Iraqi oil? are not they foriegn too? "Anger is an acid that could do extra damage to the vessel in which that is kept than to something on which that is poured" Mark Twain