According to reliable sources, James Cameron found ossuaries bearing the names "Fred" and "Wilma". Although no last names were recorded, Cameron announced the find could only be the family tomb of the Flintstones. The "Modern Stone Age Family" made television history with their primetime cartoon series, and were largely thought to be fictional until this concrete evidence surfaced. While not conclusive, DNA evidence proved the remains could only be those of a husband and wife. Also found in the tomb were the remains of a small animal; possibly their beloved pet Dino. Skeptics asked why the tomb did not hold any remains of their daughter, Pebbles. Cameron explained that she would have been laid to rest in the family tomb of her husband, Bam Bam Rubble.
2007-03-04 16:34:39 · 12 answers · asked by Sister Christian 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Did I miss something? What scientific hypothesis is proven with speculation and conjecture? The scientist who did the limited DNA testing said, “Don’t be deceived by the media. This type of DNA testing cannot test every relationship.”
I’m glad that most folks “get” it. It is so great when we can play together nicely.
2007-03-05 17:52:47 · update #1
There is no conclusive evidence that those bones are not the bones of BETTY instead of Wilma.
2007-03-04 17:06:25 · answer #1 · answered by Cosmic I 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't he amazing? I heard on the way back from discovering the Fred and Wilma ossuaries, the crew decided to stop on a small island for a day of sun and surf. To their surprise, they came upon a small village of survivors from a shipwreck, who had been trying to return home for several years. Being the great guy that he is, he also gave a young Hollywood starlet, named Ginger, one of the shipwrecked castaways, a starring role in his next "docudrama". Gilligan just wanted a chili cheese dog, and turned down the job offer.
2007-03-04 16:52:13 · answer #2 · answered by lorilou 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i hope his next one is about a magical guy in the sky that does everything, or proof of a boat that had every animal aboard, then i want him to find the ruins of the tower of babel.... get my drift? you make fun of someone making a scientific observation about a burial tomb, you can't refute it so you make fun of it. typical.
2007-03-04 16:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by Woody 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
actually... he made a documentary about a tomb with coffins that said Jesus son of Joseph, Mary, Jose, and Mathew
2007-03-04 16:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by AfWuEcSkOyMoEu 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Almost as dumb as him making a Titanic sequel
2007-03-04 16:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by benignmalaprop 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Heheheheh... I wish Y!A still let us give "thumbs-up" to questions!
A note to Nicholas - did you actually see the post-interview of the whole Jesus Tomb thing? Reed was right - it wasn't "science", it was "archeo-porn".
2007-03-04 16:37:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
*falls off chair laughing*
2007-03-04 16:37:44 · answer #7 · answered by Esther 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ha, Ha, lol....good one....I really like that.....maybe they will make a new "documentary'....ha, ha, ha...
2007-03-04 16:37:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I LOVE IT!
2007-03-04 16:37:27 · answer #9 · answered by Miss Momma 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
another Christian making fun of science...I am so shocked!!!
2007-03-04 16:38:08 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋