No. 3
It's a hoot watching history repeating itself over and over, whilst we, poor suckers, just lap it all up. Take computers, I had a Commodore 64 in the beginning of the 80's, got to enjoy fooling around with it and graduated to the first Apple Mac in the UK in 85. That machine had about 64k of RAM and about 640 k of hard drive, and I could do just about anything I wanted to do then, or now. Now, my newest acquisition is a HP laptop, with 1.7 ghz processor, 100 gigs hard, 1 meg RAM and so on and so on. Does is get me going any quicker ? Not really, it's a lot fancier, graphics sound etc, but i still sit here watching the grass grow while the infernal machine machinates.
1964 New York World's Fair. My first automatic door. I was so fascinated by it that I must have gone backwards and forwards a hundred times, what do I do now ? When an automatic door fails to open quickly enough I swear at it !!
We are a weird lot, us humans, but I still get a laugh out of being one.....well almost.
2007-03-04 14:23:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by cosmicvoyager 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don`t talk silly just because things are improving or updating doesn`t mean you have to have the latest product. I keep up to date with video games because of the enjoyment they give me but I won`t buy a PS 3 as I have a 360 and I am happy with that. I download music for free and see no reason to buy either a HD dvd or blue ray as i am happy with dvd just relax and enjoy. I have no brand loyalty tho would choose the best value for money Vista is well overpriced so I will wait for it to become more reasonable. Ps surely things improving is a good thing
2007-03-04 14:23:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consumers go with what's easiest to use and with what's most available.
With endless corporate mergers, everything leads to the same monopolic road. It's just a matter of time before everything's compatible with everything else, or else fall by the way of the 8 track or the Beta or the LaserDisc
2007-03-04 14:11:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sudy Nim 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're puzzling the idea of extraterrestrial existence with the known way of existence theory of extraterrestrial beings which visit Earth. From a danger perspective, that is likely that there is existence obtainable besides us. certain, that is a complicated and unbelievable procedure that leads to existence. unbelievable doesn't advise no longer achieveable, it got here about right here, and given the fashion of stars contained in the galaxy (and the completed universe for that count number), that is achieveable for it to have got here about elsewhere. there is truly no data that extraterrestrials have visited Earth at any element contained in the historic previous of our species. None. Youtube isn't a source for something. UFOs are not any more extremely a proper subject matter, out lack of ability to change into conscious of something has a lot less to do with it being something uncommon and extra to do with the barriers of our potential to change into conscious of issues in undesirable situations (low lighting fixtures, operating example). there is no longer something to tutor that element go back and forth is achieveable. the reason this style of large volume of "extraterrestrial beings" resemble people is they're fictional, or perhaps at our maximum creative, our minds have problem. Your understand-how of danger is fallacious, 50/50 isn't an outstanding way of searching at it. that is like rolling a die and declaring there's a 50/50 danger of rolling a 6, both you do or you do not, although that is properly time-honored that there is a a million/6 danger of that effect. you're accurate that we do not have any data. till we easily have data, we are speculating. yet in technological expertise, hypothesis has a tendency to be much better than merely kicking round concepts, it continues to be heavily in accordance with properly known clinical principals.
2016-11-27 22:00:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋