yes. its interesting
2007-03-04 13:41:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by stupidgirll74 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not much. I've already heard the arguments on both sides from back when the tomb was first found. It's even more unconvincing with Cameron involved, and as an atheist I'm a sympathetic ear. But I also have the academic depth to know the claims about the identities of the remains are completely untestable, and as someone committed to critical thinking and scientific method I have to have testable evidence. So my response is that it adds nothing to what we already know and changes nothing we already know.
But I can barely keep my eyes open and am headed to bed, so it was good for something.
2007-03-04 21:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm actually going to DVR it. Since my girlfriend is working, I have to make sure to DVR the following: Desperate Housewives, Family Guy and Battlestar Galactica. You can only record so many programs at once.
2007-03-04 21:42:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by taa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it's all bullcrap. Jesus is not on this erath for he is rissen.. so duhh... And marry magdealine is not an apostile she was an whore untill jesus forgiven her. I wish people would quit trying to ruin the righteousness of god. and Marry Magdeline is not jesus wife and nor did they havea kid
2007-03-04 22:23:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Boss 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not on till later here.But without Gods DNA ,this is a just stupid.
Mary was and is the most common name ever,as is John,James,and who ever else they think they found.
When they get Gods DNA then we can talk.
love Nana<><
2007-03-04 21:43:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by funnana 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If it is any different from the hype they tried to make of it in 1996 let me know.
2007-03-04 21:45:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I tried to, but I just can't sit and watch stuff most of the time.
2007-03-04 21:41:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No...I only just remembered it after missing the first half hour. I think it repeats at 1am my time...I may see if it's any good then...
2007-03-04 21:43:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A) Why are they treating this like it's a NEW story?
B) Why don't they wait til they have bones/DNA rather than just a friggen box?
I way more appreciated this duo's Exodus Decoded work ....
2007-03-04 22:40:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i could for extra cred in religion, but i'd haveta write a summary, and i'm too lazy so i'm not even going to bother
2007-03-04 21:43:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by crazydrummer347 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shhh it's on in 2 hours where I am...
2007-03-04 21:43:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jesus who? 1
·
2⤊
0⤋