Chuck Norris.
2007-03-04 11:57:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jordin 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think a silverback would it is smarter and the strenght of a gorilla is more than a grizzly. The silverback would move quicker and the bear would run out of steam a lot quicker as well.
In the end the silverback would just beat the living crap out of the grizzly with it powerfull strikes.
2007-03-04 12:07:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by luckylovelee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grizzly Bear
2007-03-05 09:11:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The grizzly would kick the **** out of the gorilla and than rip its head off. Seven foot tall 350 to 850lbs
2007-03-04 12:03:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd might want to bypass with the gorilla! the speed and quickness component would take precedent. The power and fury of the gorilla's combos would placed the submit to on his decrease back dazed. it does no longer be a straight forward victory because of the submit to's length and weight. Silverback via ko contained in the 12th!
2016-11-27 21:47:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grizzly. The claws and bite radius would be the deciding factor as strength is probably equal, and agility will not factor in too much in a close battle.
2007-03-04 12:03:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by edozedo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grizzly. Pretty much the most dominate animal on the planet.
2007-03-04 11:57:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Copernicus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its hard to say because the gorillia could run up a tree and be safe and the grizzlebare could proable kill the silverback beacuse
bears are very deadly.
2007-03-04 14:01:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grizzly.
Or Chuck Norris.
2007-03-04 13:30:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by ATWolf 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ask the Koreans as they did have animal fights
Kodiak Grizzy beat all 15' power
2007-03-04 12:05:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋