Sorry, it is the other way. We humans are doing it and did it. Here is a copy of a letter I sent to Al Gore:
Putting the technology together to start cleaning up and reintroducing new ozone to the atmosphere is possible. The cost and size of this project means taking a long term commitment. I am proposing the biggest cleanup in history. Al, I do not see any proposal that is realistic or proven at any cost, not even Washington can solve this problem. But if every person on earth does his or her share, we may be ok. Never-the-less, I see governments acting like a deer in a car’s headlights and people doing the same thing. The inevitable is almost upon us. Cleanup and change is the only option.
The first cleanup machine starts with a ten billion dollars investment. Ten year later with twenty-five machines operating, these machines will produce enough ozone to replace both holes at the poles. But more importantly, these machines will remove chemicals that deplete the ozone. Beyond making ozone, decreasing the poisons that deplete ozone, these machines reduce the major greenhouse gases and unbelievably we can have all this for fewer than one hundred billion dollars.
Beyond cleaning up our atmospheric mess as I am suggesting, we humans must do a better job reducing or cleaning up carbon monoxide, collecting and storing methane and ethane for fuel, burning less of everything, cleaning up our forests and using more solar insolation. Solar steam electric generators are the type of systems we need and are 90 percent efficient and near 100 percent if heat recovery is used. I believe nearly 30,000 MW are needed in the USA and Mexico over the next 30 years. This opens the door to new electric cars, new construction vital to our way of life, new bullet trains, and these industries produce new high paying jobs. From small scale solar generators on malls, to 2000 acre collector sights, these systems are viable and ready for production. The Federal Government must give up some land, money and have less regulation to help save the planet from disaster.
Al, spreading the message that we can help ourselves is a key to the development of these businesses. Washington can help: the businesses need grants, patents, land and regulations. Congress must create a pollution surcharge. From gas, coal, diesel, wood to cooling towers, from cattle, other ranches to cigarettes, from agriculture burning to airplane passengers, this surcharge can fund parts of these projects and many stationary pollution control devices in general.
Your personal support is very important to getting the atmosphere cleanup started and developing sights for solar generators.
Sincerely,
-I have not gotten a responce.
2007-03-04 11:44:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by RayM 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
The main problem isn't what evidence there is but the lack of evidence. I'm curious as to the evidence you have found to support human caused Global warming. Please tell me you're not referring to algores movie, that's been shown to be bogus, with camera tricks. All I can ever find is speculation and allot of hypothesis. As far as natural occurrence, Historically the earth has gotten cooler then warmer then cooler and so on. As the previous poster said "there was an Ice age and now there is not."
Also the last ten years the earth's average temperature has fallen. Is that enough evidence to signal we are headed for another Ice age? In the 1970's the same scientists that are claiming global warming now were saying global cooling then.
2007-03-04 12:20:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by jack_scar_action_hero 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There was speculation in the first place because there were times in Earth's history where there were periods of natural global warming. What scientists believed caused that natural period of warming were micro organisms that were released from the ice of the arctic poles. They went up into the atmosphere and 'naturally' warmed it. However, scientists have not been able to prove that the micro organisms were released in this instance so they have concluded that is is not 'natural' and must be caused by humans.
Another thing they are worried about is the fact that if it is caused by us, and the arctic ice melts up at the poles, thus releasing those micro organisms, that we may get a double wammy of global warming.
I hope we figure out what is what and do what we have to do to fix it, but so far, I have seen nothing but incompetence.
2007-03-04 11:46:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You can get a lot of good science if you go to nasa.gov-they do a lot of the research.
But you won't find any evidence, solid or othrwise, to "support" the idea that the current global warming and climate change is natrural, rather than human in origin. Scientists spend the last towo decades making that determination--and the debate is over. Global warming is human-originated.
Note--I'm not saying we shouldn't discuss the issue--but the real issue--which is what to do about climat echange, not nonsensical pretense over its reality.
2007-03-04 12:17:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Thank you for specifying credible sources. There are many, many front groups, conservative think thanks, etc, that put forth so called scientists and scientific studies in a fraudulant manner.
As far as I can tell, the only scientists who aren't funded by such are not directly climatologists, and thus their specialties do not to my mind grant them the qualifications to be making such assertions.
May I suggest reading "Trust us We're Experts" which details the way that oil and energy companies have allied with conservative think tanks to reposition global warming (and man's responsiblity of) to theory rather than fact.
If you find scientists whose funding sources aren't dirty, who actually are climatologists whose speciality is the climate and what affects the climate, who don't think that this is our fault, please let me know, because I am looking for them too!
2007-03-04 12:04:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by peacedevi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To the first guy that posted.
Yes there was an ice age back then but there was still no cars back then either....no power plants,factories and no other pollutants.
I would have to look the stuff up again to give you more specifics.
I have researched it from both sides and my findings is the earth goes through warming and cooling periods.
But through history the global warming is not man made.
It is fact though the earth is getting closer to the sun and solar flares are to blame also.
2007-03-04 11:52:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by crazycul1 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolute proof that the cause is not humans = there was an ice age 10,000 years ago & there isn't now.
2007-03-04 11:38:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
those are hard to pin down it is much easier to find the effects of humanity
are natural cycles in the planets life
but a lot is influenced by mans existance ,and this is increasing with overpopulation,putting strains on Natural resources and increasing contaminations as well as destructions of essential componants the ensure living conditions for all life forms
some home truths
politicians and scientists who work for politicians have downplayed the facts because solutions are expensive and means change and change effects many people income,and most of the world is kept in the dark of the real things that are going on.
in North Africa,India,Mexico ,millions of people are effected by land loss and desertification
in recent times thousands of people have died because of exessive heat,usually old people.in India ,Mexico and France,
deforestation causing desertification,the desert conditions causing very cold nights and scorching hot days
in china, thousands of what used to be farmers are running for their lives from the dust storms that have burried their towns and turned their lands into dessert,the globe where they were got to hot for them .
and instead of producing food they are now needing it from some where else,and they will drastically effect the world food prices when they start buying water in the form of grains ,at any cost destabalising governments, in some countries ,could be the result
(are you seeing more Chinese around interested in agricultural lands ,we do here in Mexico)
,the Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year
and all of the desserts we know are a results of mans actions ,and they are increasing ,not getting less ,in the dinosaurs days ,there were no desserts.
collectively this planet is drying up because of bad farming practices like,over grazing and fertilizers,
as far as the food production is concerned, Global warming or some of its effects are serious,rising seas result in landloss
each degree rise in temperature means 10%crop loss
more landloss because of desertification every year,we have less areble land to produce food ,for an extra 70 million people ,
and there is less and less water (because of deforestation),to irrigate this production ,
and there are less and less farmers to do it..
who are overpumping deep carbon aquifiers
who are plowing more and more unstable lands because they have lost so many million hectares to desertification ,
because of bad farming practises ,such as using fertilizers and heavy machinary or over grazing
RISING SEAS
The northpole is melting ,and we will know it without ice in our life times.
this does not affect the sea level because it is ice that is already in the water.but the melting ice from Green land and the south pole ,are another matter.
Global warming is in theory reversable,but it will mean global co operation between all countries ,and taking into account human nature and the world politics ,it is unlikely that this will happen,
At least not untill we are all in the middle of planetary disastres and it becomes a battle for the survival of humanity every where.
SOLUTIONS
if you want to help the planet ,plant a tree every week ,if everyone on the planet did we we would be able to reverse the destructive processes
reduce carbon emisions,and they are already working on that by alternative forms of energy and regulations on carbon producing materials,aerosol cans,burning rubbish,industrial chimneys,powerplants etc.
the capture of carbon and the production of water and assist the aquiferous manta.
the world bank pays large subsidies for reforrestation to capture carbon and the best tree for this is the Pawlonia
Waterharvesting projects ,such as millions of small dams.to redirect over ground waterflows from the rains into the ground to supply subteranian water supplies.
the protection of existing forrests.
stop building more highways,urban planning to include vegetation stop building cities encourage people to return to the land to conduct their business from there which now has become possible thanks to the internet.
education to motivate people to auto sufficiency by building more home food gardens.
education on environmental awareness
education on family planning to curb over´populaion
Agricultural education and improvements to follow the principals or sustainability and soil management.
more environmental or land ,design to prevent bush fires,such as--fire breaks
,more dams.regulations and control for public behaviour
alternative effeciant public transport to discourage the use of the internal conbustion engine
recicling wastes,limit water use
i am a Permaculture Consultant for the department of Ecology for the regional government in Guerrero Mexico
http://spaces.msn.com/byderule
Source(s) Lester E Brown is the director and founder of the global institute of Environment in the United states .he has compiled a report based on all the satalite information available from NASA,and all the information that has
come from Universities and American embassies WORLD WIDE ,
his little book--a planet under stress , Plan B has been trans lated into 50 languages and won the best book award in 2003.
2007-03-04 12:21:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
None
2007-03-04 11:39:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by gugulimpy 1
·
0⤊
2⤋