Okay, Mr. Creationist here. So what is one question that you evolutionists would ask me that we creationist have not answered so far?
2007-03-04 08:47:21 · 8 answers · asked by Theoretically Speaking 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, I know what science is. I love science and I can't get enough of it. But evolution is not science to much of it relies on faith!
Cosmic
Stellar
Organic
Macro
All of these forms of evolution rely on faith, you have no evidence for this!!!!!
2007-03-04 09:02:55 · update #1
Where is your Nobel prize? Certainly if you could prove 'creationism' you'd have at least one (and maybe more) Nobel prizes.
In simpler terms, where is your peer reviewed scientific paper on creationism?
Create one and you'll be rich, famous and a hero among your peers.
Until then, you're just one more silly 'creationist' posting on R&S.
Since when does someone have to have a Nobel Prize in ordered to be listened too?
Where was Darwins prize? What about Newtons? Einsteins? Right Now I'm only fifteen, but once I get out of college, then I will go around and try to prove evolution. You can get all of the awards you want but that doesn't mean you're smarter...
And since 95% of scientists accept evolution and even use lies to teach it, would they really accept it if I were able to prove it?
2007-03-04 09:06:52 · update #2
Well nothing because I don't believe in stupid evolution. So I guess we're in the same boat.
PS - evolutionists make me mad. We have the Bible for evidence AND everything fits perfectly (science) with the Bible. But evolution doesn't even make sense! They don't even understand what they believe!
2007-03-04 08:52:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Where is your Nobel prize? Certainly if you could prove 'creationism' you'd have at least one (and maybe more) Nobel prizes.
In simpler terms, where is your peer reviewed scientific paper on creationism?
Create one and you'll be rich, famous and a hero among your peers.
Until then, you're just one more silly 'creationist' posting on R&S.
Edit:
Evolution says *nothing* about 'cosmic' or 'stellar' phenomenon. Plus the term 'organic' just means carbon based. 'Macro' is just a term fundies use.
You *really* have no idea wtf you're talking about my friend. You're just throwing terms out that you don't even know how to apply.
Lastly, you have not written a scientific paper for only one reason:
You can't.
Everything else is an excuse.
2007-03-04 17:01:13 · answer #2 · answered by Bad Buddhist 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sweetie, you cannot answer any of my creationist questions based on faith. Because it is based on your faith which does not have any objective evidence. By faith i believe i can walk through an ocean and not drown. Does that answer your question about the validity of gravity? No. It just tells you what i believe
2007-03-04 18:10:06 · answer #3 · answered by uz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
answered or logically explained? you can answer everything, doesnt mean the answer is right or that it is even close. im sure some of your answers were, god made it so or "because the bible says so" those arent real answers anyone can buy. thus you havent given an answer people will agree with
2007-03-04 16:57:27 · answer #4 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in evolution ........!
I mean OK I believe that god created us & the man was not an ape or any other animal.
but I don't deny it........!!!!
I mean the idea that an animal became another animal ( not human ) is possible don't u think.........
2007-03-04 17:02:18 · answer #5 · answered by zeido zeido 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Adam and Eve were hungry, why not eat the snake instead of the apple? Seems tastier.
2007-03-04 16:54:04 · answer #6 · answered by Tania La Güera 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What the hell is wrong with you? -or: How can you possibly be so very wrong? -or: Do you have any proof aside from the Bible at all? -or: Do you actually know what science is?
2007-03-04 16:52:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree w/ SnOw_FlAkE_sWeEt 100%.
2007-03-04 17:00:10 · answer #8 · answered by ac28 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋