What, you mean like the New York Times telling the terrorists how we're traking their banking transactions - a legal and functioning program that was destroyed by them?
You mean like the NYT publishing video of a soldier's death before the family was even notified?
You mean like AP and Reuters stringers publishing doctored photos?
You mean like Rep. Murtha's plan to cut off funding for the troops?
You mean like the constant "Hang on! We're doing everything we can to pull the troopers out for you and relieve the pressure on you!" message from the Democrats, the press, and the rest of the Liberal anti-war nutroots?
You mean like the constant articles exposing techniques, tactics, and programs that we use so that the terrorists can modify their methods?
Well, it's OBVIOUS why - They HAVE to pretend to care so that people will still vote for them and give them money. You'll notice that they frequently go too far and then have to cut-'n-run from their position. Kerry's "If you're stupid you join the military and get stuck in Iraq" comment, Obama's "Wasted lives" comment, Murtha's over-the-top comments and so on.
SUPPORT THE TROOPS - LET THEM WIN!
Orion
2007-03-04 05:07:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Orion 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
They Pretend - because we American's will believe anything if we are told enough times. So they Pretend in order to get votes.
They are more worried about themselves than they are about America and it's future. If we leave Iraq now the war will become bigger and spread out even further. How do I know you ask? Because the Terrorist groups have told the World. It's not a secret. I tend to believe them when they say that. The Democrats are basically saying
" No, this won't happen", "Get out, the war is lost" This is great propaganda FOR the terrorist. And it's coming from The US Democratic party. It's an inside job........
2007-03-04 05:05:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
this question is soooo drained and flatly untrue. For the 11th-gazillion-time; in case you disagree with the conflict (and that must be 70% people) it does not propose you do not help the troops. by potential of that rational; in case you help the conflict then you certainly could desire to assist killing people. Is that actual? NO. So knock it off with the not helping the troops crap. I know, know and am perpetually grateful to the noble females and adult adult males persons who positioned their lives on the line. lots so as that i'm keen to communicate up and rigidity the government to get them out of the insane bloody quagmire George Bush led them into. helping the troops potential worrying sufficient to hold them abode, not leaving them over there in a unjustified conflict to die.
2016-10-17 06:11:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's politically expediant to show concern for our troop ! It's political suicide to show glee, when we have casualty's ! Oh yes, the duality of man !
Every word uttered by a politician is targeted for some special interest group. If they know who is their immediate audience, they target their words to fit that group, yet they are capable of talking in front of another group, less liberal, and moderating their speech to appeal to that audience ! That's just more of that duality stuff !
2007-03-04 04:53:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
If they cared about the troops they would not be encouraging the enemy.
You cannot "support the troops" if you are are working to have them fail.
2007-03-04 05:04:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think you got it wrong -- everyone seems to support our troops it is the war that is the problem understanding or better yet why we are still in Iraq .
2007-03-04 05:14:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Patches 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
They pretend so they can get the Votes. But if all been said, They careless about the people.
2007-03-04 04:52:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by allmemorylane 1
·
6⤊
1⤋
Your own US government couldn't care less about US soldiers dying. Maybe you should think about that. Liberals and conservatives are generally weak minded individuals who need someone to follow. Both groups are simply milked by another group...the land of the free.....ha ha ha.
2007-03-04 05:07:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
It's political double talk.
2007-03-04 05:54:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Exactly
2007-03-04 04:57:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋