When there are preacing race hatered against us an sucking up all our resourses at the same time?.Should them people even be aloud to stay in this country?
2007-03-04 02:14:35 · 21 answers · asked by rockchick 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The ones i meen that preach race hatred,against the people whos country they are living in an having a better life,if we english were to stand in city an preach such things would we be aloud,na we would be knicked 4 racisem so if they hate us so much,the exteemests,should they not just go back home from the west,an should they shorly not be aloud to have the luxshioury,of freedom of speech,when they speak of such hate towards us? I think everybody to a point should be allowed but we r not,so y should they come over here an be aloud?When they say such things as far as wanting us dead esample; Abdu Hamser not right spelling sorry! im not rascist,an belive in alot of muslim veiws but the real muslims,who most of wich do not agree with 911 an these people that r being allowed to say such things.So should such people from these other country still have these rights?
2007-03-06 08:29:02 · update #1
if they had freedom of speech where they came from.yes.As for race hatred, they should refuse to take housing and benefits from people they despise, by doing this, they are dining at christian tables.
2007-03-04 03:31:43 · answer #1 · answered by doda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sweetheart, yes, they shouldnt have th freedom to just say anything, rather, they can freedom of speech as long as they dont affend anyone,
as far as resources, lol, seriously, look at these facts, and where un peacekeeprs, and quote peacekeeprs, so called, are placed, look at the countries of the world, and where we get our food, and other stuff such as fuel etc from take a look at tthis resources sight of the world countries and then look at all the problems we have in those parts of the world, in the news etc:
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/countrylisting.html
search for resources, i rest my case, have anice day
but note, any radicals or people who promote hatred, not allowed, simply is wrong in all religions, ethics, philisophy, and believes,!
2007-03-04 02:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by jam 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How can u take someones voice away .... They come over here for a better life ... They are not "sucking up all of our resources".... i would rather help out people who want to make a better life for themselves than pay out for ppl who sit on their backsides all day complaining and not doing anything to help themselves ... u know the chav culture ... spit out kids , more kids and more kids , claim all the benefits going and still want more ... hate ppl who think that the world owes them a favour ... because no actually it doesn't !
2007-03-04 02:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by jizzumonkey 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sweet Brigid, of course! Freedom of Speech is very important. Without it we couldn't practice different religions. And we definately couldn't get on the internet and ask/answer various questions. We may not like what people have to say, but they do have the right to say it. I personally hate when people automatically say God Bless you, if you didn't believe in god, would you still be blessed? But they still have the right to say it.
2007-03-04 02:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by Jayda 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think people who come to this country should be respectful to their benefactor. There is no shame or blame in wanting a better life, but they should not be angry after "recieving " it. That's what this country is supposed to be about. Sharing the wealth and a better place to be. Not this race hatred religion hatred crap the media is feeding to us. It's just a deviding tool, to feed the mean machine.
2007-03-04 02:21:37 · answer #5 · answered by sanctuary 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It would be very bad if you have a different regime of laws for Immigrants and Natives. They are not just sucking up resources as you said they are also enriching the government by paying taxes and creating wealth. Your proposal would lead to a very serious crisis in UK if adopted.
2007-03-04 02:55:56 · answer #6 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As long as they can spell properly. And for everyone with command of the English language that we allow in, we could chuck out someone who is semi-literate.
2007-03-04 05:06:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pssh, I never knew the citizens of the UK still HAD freedom of speech!
From where I sit it looks Orwellian over there.
2007-03-04 02:29:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
yes they should still have the right to freedom of speech because they are people just like me and you. They should be treated fairly and with all the same rights. I hope you dont discriminate just because of where people are born or what they look like.
2007-03-04 02:18:34 · answer #9 · answered by ccc 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes they should,and it should be widely reported and our own politicians should take there points on one at a time and shoot them down in flames.That's if these preachers of hate dare hold themselves and there bile open to scrutiny.
2007-03-04 02:24:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋