By playing the odds.
2007-03-04 01:21:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Guess Who 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2016-06-09 11:17:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its very hard to be a consistent winner on the horses ech year. Not too many people can do it. The best way to win on the horses is to write down all of your suggested bets/wagers in a book and bet on them hypothetically, and put the real money into your sock drawer instead of on the horse. You will have saved more money in your sock drawer than you would have won on the season.
2016-03-16 04:03:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well choose the winning horse! ;) lol
Well a lot of people just look up on the horses history to see how many races they've been in and how many they've won and what their odds where. I'm not a better on horse racing but I've just been around it for a while, so I just kind-a learn.
2007-03-04 04:25:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it was possible to win on a consistent basis horse tracks would go out of business.
The delusion that you can win on a consistent basis means you might have a gambling problem.
Have you ever seen a horse track go out of business from paying too many winners?
2007-03-04 01:25:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Floyd M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bet on all horses
2007-03-04 01:26:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ButterMilkQueso 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
take all the money you project betting on horseraces, and put it in a CD with the highest yield you can find...ive been betting races for about 30 years now...and you have a few huge days collecting, and a lot of days losing...
2007-03-04 01:37:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by doingitright44 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
a tip,
never bet on the horse with the highest odds or the horse with the lowest odds
2007-03-04 03:15:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Child 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
bet the odds favorite for show only,,,you will not win alot ,,better than nothing
2007-03-04 01:57:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by jerry 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
eazy
bet on every combination
2007-03-04 01:22:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by god knows and sees else Yahoo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋