First of all, nope I don't know everything. True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing
Second of all, you are committing a fatal logical error. According to the beliefs of Christianty, Judaism, Islam, God is always omnipresent. Therefore, God must exist 100%, half of God is no God.
Third of all, we all know God, not technically God, but the CONCEPTION OF GOD. We acknowledge it, and by acknowledging, I mean it's not the same as believing. There were too many contradictions to be found, and I followed my logic
2007-03-03 19:01:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
This question isn't very fair for a few reasons.
1. If God exists it shold be evident ( not necessarily obvious) by examining our own minds and the world around us and everyone has the ability to do that, even if you don't know everything.
2. You could say the same thing about Theists, if we don't know everything then how can we be sure there is a God.
However I would like to point out some of the responses to this question are flawed as well particularly the idea that if God created everything he would "be in" everything.
I created a paiting the other day, am I in that painting? So why would God "be in" evertying he created? To take this further by simply examining a painting I paited and using no other information would you be able to prove my existance or much less tell anything about me? This is the problem with using science alone to prove or disprove God or learn much about who he is. This is why we must consider other feilds of study as well when considering these questions.
2007-03-03 19:13:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dane_62 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is an interesting (even if it is tired) argument for the existence of god, but it doesn't hold up.
In the grand scheme of things, I don't know very much. But when I want to know about something, I take the time to find it out. For example, a few minutes ago I asked a question about polytheists and their take on the afterlife. I didn't know the answer, so I asked ... and now I have a better understanding then I had before.
There was a point of time when I was actively looking for god. My experience was that he/she/it was nowhere to be found. So, even if I don't know everything, there is no reason why I'm not able to look into a particular subject and make conclusions from there.
2007-03-03 19:07:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well then they got an unfair shot at excepting Christ into their lives. If you think about it, there is no fairness to the contest. Every person gets a completely different story and different amounts of information yet they are all expected to reach the same conclusion.. namely that Jesus is real and died for my sins. The facts and logic speak for themselves. It's not a fair contest. I am an atheist and have always said, "If I could have an operation to make my believe, I'd do it. Why wouldn't I?" Does this qualify me for heaven if I am wrong? Nay. The road to hell is paved with good intentions afterall.
2007-03-03 19:10:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's possible for anybody to know even close to half of everything. For instance, do you know what I did today? No. And there are about 6 billion people like me that almost all people can't speak for. Then you have all the plants, animals, and the rest of the universe to deal with.
2007-03-03 19:02:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
God exists in everything everybody knows, only the atheists are not aware of it, having been put off by illogical religious dogma, and by believing that it represents the true information about God. If all sensible atheists studied the Concept of "Rational Spirituality" available on the Dhaxem website, they would become rational, logical theists, as did everyone else who studied and understood that Concept. If you just look at the two sets of laws it contains, the Laws of the Universe, and the Divine Laws, it will become obvious that this information could only have been conveyed from the Source, unlike religious scriptures compiled by man.
2007-03-03 19:07:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
it somewhat is debatable regardless of if it somewhat is extra advantageous to be the sufferer of a malicious act than an twist of destiny. a lot of people sense extra advantageous i think of if their misfortune has a purpose. God or the devil or another supernatural capacity ******* with them is extra gentle than the actuality, because of fact it makes them sense like they're significant sufficient to rely and there continues to be some administration. the thought they could be destroyed fully by potential of an uncaring, unaware universe for no reason in any respect could nicely be terrifying. besides the undeniable fact that it's not significant in case you detect a devil actively plotting against much less frightening than an unfathomable universe destroying you on the grounds which you're somewhat in simple terms dirt. A delusion being comforting does not make it genuine.
2016-10-17 05:42:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
But what if god doesn't exist in that other 50%? Then you've gone and lived a horrible wretched life filled with guilt and misery, trying to make others do the same--and it was all for nothing. Pretty sad, huh?
2007-03-03 19:09:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jensenfan 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's an extremely self-serving statement. Nobody knows everything so you use a thinly veiled attempt to state that since we don't know everything, God could exist in the part we don't know. Do you have a point here? I didn't think so!
2007-03-03 19:02:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by eastchic2001 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
And what makes you think you've got it right, dude? What if you picked the WRONG God? Then what? You'd be crying the blues if you died and found out that it was really the Aztec Gods running the show wouldn't you?
2007-03-03 20:04:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋