Did Monotheism birth Science? Would logic and scientific method have developed in a polytheistic world?

Question

I'm a polytheist. I'm not trying to bash polytheists.

Answer 1

No. Science precedes monotheism.

Answer 2

Hero of Alexandria, Archimedes, Euclid and Pythagoras were Polytheistic and all of them lived before Christianity was legislated as the state religion of the Roman Empire..... So given simply those four men and not even including Chinese and Indian science, I would say that logic and the scientific method were already features of a polytheistic world.

Answer 3

Would there be a vegetarian version of a hamburger if there were no cows? Does supply create demand? Or does demand create supply? Ask a friar. Look at the world today and all the technology. Does technology make us more civilized? Does religion? No. Science is not civilization nor does it make a society more civil. We are monkeys without tails running around killing each other guided by a few smart monkeys and a few religious monkeys.

Answer 4

Actually, it did not--quite the opposite. Look at the Mayans, the Ancient Greeks and Romans. I think science took a downturn upon the advent of Christianity, as the church took a dim view of any challenges to the Bible, or anything else that might be "heretical".
Seems like logic flew out the window until the Renaissance, then it was still uphill---

Answer 5

Well, as to logic, Aristotle looked to the greek pantheon. As to the scientific method, most early scientists in monotheistic christiandom where burned or arrested. In the more enlightened muslim lands ( who admired aristotle) they had some more leeway, but were still bound by scripture.
How long was it before christian europe was close to matching the achievments of rome? Monotheism set science back a thousand years.

Answer 6

listen intently what I say. element # a million. Whichever u . s . will artwork flat out will benefit from the outcome. contained in the start even as Muslims were in skill and were conscious, they contributed in all spheres of existence such as technological expertise. even as muslims left their route and for this reason became weak and so the West got here up as demanding operating people so the benefits went to them. Now we are watching chinese language arising so would properly be if West quit operating, possibly chinese language take over the extra progression contained in the international. So worldly positive factors are with hard work and truthfulness. If muslims do better they're going to be exalted. element #2. Muslims would upward push and fall depending upon how a lot they maintain on with Islam. although the truth of Islam will stay placed and truth of Islam and Christianity has similarities yet easily that todays Christianity isn't a similar what become extra via Jesus. If today West accepts Islam, they're going to be glorified. So God has no longer constrained Islam to Arabs or Asia yet whosoever follows the dictates of Islam will be glorified. contained in the international after merely those who were on the right route ie Islam will be exalted.

Answer 7

The west borrowed a ton of learning from India (polytheistic). So it could have developed in polytheistic world.

Answer 8

Science did not need monotheism. Science needs little more than itself, and that is fact and reason and experiment.

Think about it - would F = ma have REALLY been looked down upon more by polytheists than monotheists?

Answer 9

Enlightened religion is the key to the development of science, not the number of gods.

Answer 10

No. Science developed in spite of religion, not because of it, and the number of gods has nothing to do with it: the issue is, does one believe in supernatural occurrences, or deny their possibility?