Sure it is, but God hates taxes.
2007-03-03 15:54:55 · 12 answers · asked by kappalokka 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It's a valid question. If the child dies in the womb, it's murder (supposedly) but if he is born into poverty and dies from related malnutrition it's not murder?
2007-03-03 15:59:46 · update #1
In another question I made a point about pro-lifers wanting everybaby to be born, yet most don't make an effort to help those children that are born to parents who don't want them. Or help those children whose parents have them and raise them in disgusting, abusive, dangerous households. For each pro-lifer, I wonder, why don't you adopt a child, since you want them to be given a life so bad (even if that life is destined to be horrible from the start)?
2007-03-03 15:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by eastchic2001 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You think taxes is the answer?
Eastchic, we believe everyone deserves to live who has been given life. Now you say the unborn aren't people, so they're fair game, especially if you can make a financial argument against them coming to term. Who's next? The elderly? The invalid? I know you have to reject that "logical conclusion," but once we start relegating people at varying stages of existence as human or non-human, what is to prevent the trend from escalating? Also, if someone doesn't want their child, they are able in most communities to leave the baby at the fire station or other locations with no questions asked.
2007-03-03 15:59:49 · answer #2 · answered by celebduath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is there a question here or are you making a point?
P.S. Oh, I see...another "Pro" baby killing arguement. Thanx for clearing it up for me. By the way, have you or anyone else around here seen what an abortion procedure looks like? Have you seen what a "partial-birth" procedure looks like? Go search it and look for some photos or video. It will change your inner being to watch the brutality done to helpless babies. And we think we live in an advanced and civilized society. Hardly.
And I'm sure you've also heard.... new laws now require anesthesia to be administered to the "fetus" (also read as "Baby") because when they stab the baby in the back of the head at the base of the skull, it feels tortuous pain and writhes around trying to get away from it. If you can justify that to me, give it your best shot.
But then again, I guess those "Pro-Choice" folks such as yourself can rest easy in the knowledge that the baby's skull collapses and its over in a very short time. May God have mercy on us all for allowing this to go on.
2007-03-03 15:57:55 · answer #3 · answered by Augustine 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
A pregnant woman can go to an adoption agency and find a couple to adopt their baby. If this happened then the baby would not end up in foster care, or on the streets, etc.. There are so many couples who want to adopt babies. Have you ever heard of a pregnant woman who couldn't find a home for her unborn child? I bet you haven't because it's always the other way around.
Based off your arguement, we should start killing babies in foster care. That would be the humane thing to do right?
2007-03-03 16:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by Melissa 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why is that GODS fault? And what are you trying to say, that its better to kill a baby before it even has a chance to have parents and brothers and sisters and friends and grandparents and aunts and uncles and teachers, because you know that children who live in poverty and die young have all these things such as love, have you ever heard of that.
2007-03-03 16:03:49 · answer #5 · answered by tanat 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Good grief.
Are you pro-abortion types so bent on defending your secular holy sacrament of abortion, that you must resort to such DESPERATE arguments?
You don't give a rat's tail about poor children, do you? You only want to appeal to them, use them, and exploit their plight to push abortion.
There are 1.5 million abortions every year in the US, and the vast majority of those do NOT involve people living in the dire poverty you describe.
Some of you pro-abortion people have absolutely no shame. Not when you employ "arguments" such as the one you've posted here.
Sick.
.
2007-03-03 16:21:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
You dont could desire to assist abortion to assist determination. Making abortion unlawful won't suddenly boost the adulthood point of all the those that get pregnant whilst they could desire to not. They wont say unexpectedly, "nicely, on the grounds that abortion is unlawful, i might extra advantageous positioned on a condom or take a pill or abstain". they'll in simple terms turn to unlawful abortions. And unhappy because it somewhat is to declare, like it or not, women will turn back to brutal hassle-free strategies to do away with the fetus from their bodies (coat hangers are evoked). the government has no enterprise finding out what's terrific for anyones physique, and any fool can see that if the government gets its foot interior the door, it is going to benefit further and further administration over our bodies. And in case you communicate approximately abortion homicide, how are you able to dictate what style of "human" is eligible for homicide?? I cant flow out interior the line and settle on who to homicide. it extremely is an unreasonable argument. regardless of if it somewhat is a human, then it somewhat is homicide regardless. whilst you're keen to %. and choose which newborn dies, then you certainly are not to any extent further in touch approximately human existence than the different murderer. That in simple terms doesnt make any experience. people WILL do what they choose, in spite of the regulation. not something the government can do will avert that. people could desire to worry extra approximately their own lives than they do approximately what their acquaintances are as much as.
2016-10-17 05:30:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does doing nothing to prevent the sunrise implicitly condone photosynthesis??
Who is the question aimed at anyway, humans or mythological deities? Well if deities existed, then yes, they would be murderers. Humans half a world away, though, do not have blood on their hands.
2007-03-03 16:05:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How is starving children to death allowed? either they cause it or not! Show some backbone for the responsibility of the guardians towards the children . I really find your euphemism for cause deplorable although it probably is not your fault .
2007-03-03 16:05:45 · answer #9 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God does not hate taxes. his son even said Give to Ceaser what is Ceaser's, and Give to God what is God's. basicaly pay the taxes you owe but remember God to.
2007-03-03 15:59:46 · answer #10 · answered by Thumbs down me now 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋