2007-03-03 10:49:08 · 12 answers · asked by DBA GODZY 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not even a scaly, green, fire-breathing woman, N.H.? Heehee!
*hugs*
2007-03-03 11:01:59 · update #1
A bit presumptuous aren't you, Liz Biggard.
I didn't decide I was gay. I discovered I was gay. I also, in the process, discovered that I was definitely not heterosexual. No amount of cajoling could ever convince me to get that close to a woman. <<<< s h u d d e r >>>>
2007-03-03 10:57:54 · answer #1 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Many feel that if homosexuality is genetic rather than optional, this justifies the lifestyle. In other words, “I am that way genetically so it cannot possibly be wrong and I should not be judged for it.”
Whether it is genetic or optional is not the point at all. Some people have a genetic predisposition toward alcoholism. Others have a genetic predisposition toward illicit drug dependency. Do we say that because they are genetically that way, there is nothing wrong with practicing it?
According to scripture, we are all genetically prone to disapproved behavior. That is what sin means – to miss the mark of acceptable behavior. It is God who determines what is acceptable and not we ourselves. We all come into this world genetically sinful. And scripture everywhere teaches us to fight against it and resist. Just because we are inclined that way does not make it right.
The question is not whether homosexuality is optional or genetic. The questions is whether it is acceptable to God.
Hannah J Paul
2007-03-03 10:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by Hannah J Paul 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow, it really is quite profound. i'm hoping a lot of people will make an attempt to study it. i anticipate via "Scientifically shown" you're relating (a minimum of) the Kinsey record. Your citation from Farsi reflects a historic previous in this u . s . which many do no longer understand. till the overdue nineteenth century, "gay" become an action, no longer an id. the idea of sexuality as an id merely began to reinforce contained in the overdue nineteenth century, and persisted arising via the first area of the twentieth century. I understand what you're trying to precise, and believe you fullyyt, yet i ask your self if maximum people will be prepared to tell apart between "gay" and "gay."
2016-11-27 19:35:28 · answer #3 · answered by tubb 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
really, the whole issue makes me fume. Otherwise reasonable people turn out to be complete bigots on the whole homosexuality issue.
2007-03-03 10:52:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Pretty girls.
What do I mean? I'm a man. I fight lust of all kinds. You give me a choice, I'll pretty much (as my Jewish brethren might say) schtupp ANYTHING. But, I keep my lusts in check...all of them. And I followed the advice of St. Paul: "Since (not "IF" - "since") you all cannot all be like me (celibate)...each man have his own wife."
Thank God for my wife. God only knows what kind of horrors my lust might have gotten me into!!
2007-03-03 10:55:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
My genetic decider, decided I'd be Hetro,, and I have argued the point with people who say you chose your sexual preference.
OK like you chose your hair color,, eye color,, ethnicity!
Fvcking Idiots one and all!
2007-03-03 11:05:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The idea of sleeping with some one that is hairier than me.
2007-03-03 14:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by Creepy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Although I find girls more physically attractive than males...they are generally too emotional and lacking in penis.
2007-03-03 10:52:48 · answer #8 · answered by Adrianne 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
im a natural heterosexual
2007-03-03 10:52:29 · answer #9 · answered by funaholic 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well i always thought girls smell nicer, eat less and are better snuggles.
2007-03-03 11:07:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋