2007-03-03 07:28:03 · 24 answers · asked by benignmalaprop 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
This is by far the funniest question I've seen all day! I had to read at least five answers to get the fact that you were talking about abortion. You were, weren't you....?
2007-03-03 07:45:05 · answer #1 · answered by chocolatebunny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Assuming you meant abortion...
That depends on what you believe.
If you think that a child is still a human being while in the womb then there is no choice in the matter. A woman (or man) should not have a say in deciding to end another human being's life.
If you think that it is not a human being until after birth, then you will probably lean towards giving a woman the choice.
It gets "fuzzy" because children can be born at 22 weeks now and in many cases still survive. So in my estimation, keep something as important as "life" out of the "fuzzy" areas and call the child a human being earlier rather than later.
Here's a thought: didn't the woman already have a choice BEFORE she got pregnant. I know there will be many responses about the extremes of rape, but 99% of children conceived were because a woman AND a man made a choice...
Great question! Bad spelling!
2007-03-03 07:48:31 · answer #2 · answered by Justyn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a great deal of choice on the shelves. The market will always be there with absorption options.
I don't think abortion should be a choice. The woman should live with the consequences of her negligence for the next nine months, and then surrender her baby for adoption. Maybe after that, she won't neglect her birth control.
2007-03-03 07:35:27 · answer #3 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean abortion...no it should not be a woman's choice. No one person has the right to kill another...ever...no matter what. One life cannot be considered more valuable then another.
Murder can never been sanctioned in the name of choice. That's just plain sick! What about all the women who are aborted? Where are their rights? Three rights guaranteed under our constitution....right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! Without the first right the other two are impossible.
A woman's right to choose is before conception. She can say NO to sex before marriage!
And for those of you ready to jump on the rape/incest wagon, statistically abortions for those reasons are 1% , this means 99% are for convenience.
2007-03-03 07:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by Misty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to think I have a choice over what to absorb or not.
But jokes aside, in my opinion, abortion should be a choice, but sexual education should be more available, as well as other alternatives (like adoption), so the person can make an informed choice. I do not believe abortion should be a method of birth control, but an option.
2007-03-03 07:49:17 · answer #5 · answered by Monica A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absorption? Absorption of what? Compliments? Why yes!
2007-03-03 07:30:33 · answer #6 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Absorption is not a choice the body does it on its own.
Abortion is a choice.
2007-03-03 07:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by hazydaze 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course, everything is their choice anyway, so why absorption.
2007-03-03 07:35:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Shouldn't absorption be a woman's choice?"
Agreed. I like Viva. My wife prefers Bounty or Brawny. So Bounty or Brawny it is!
2007-03-03 07:31:33 · answer #9 · answered by Mac the Nice 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What kind of absorption would you be talking about? Tampon absorbtion? Than, absolutely!
2007-03-03 07:31:02 · answer #10 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋