Since humans are a result of an un-intelligent explosion, why can't intelligent people duplicate the process?

Question

1st, create matter and/or energy from nothing. 2nd, create a contained environment within this creation that will support life. 3rd, make intelligent life grow in the result.

If an un-intelligent based event can do it, intelligent directed events should do it even better. What's the hold up?

dgon (below) I don't equate "cloning" (which is using materials that are here to copy it) to remotely coming close to what I propose above.

Lets stick with apples and oranges, not apples and DVD burners.

Moiraes Fate (below) They did not "create" anything. They took existing materials to assemble amino acids. Humans do not create things. They mix together what has already been created to form different things.

Answer 1

No physicist claims the universe came from nothing. Matter cannot be created or destroyed.
Simply because scientists have not yet explained something does not constitute evidence of a god. This is what they call "the god of the gaps". It was used to explain even the most trivial things before science came to the rescue (as it always does)
It took us hundreds of thousands of years to discover the world is flat. Scientific discovery is an ongoing process.

Answer 2

First of all, you are assuming that creation was caused by an unintelligent event when there is ample evidence to suggest that the complexities of life could not have just occured through randomness. second, we may become intelligent one day to figure out the process if we survive as a species long enough, but right now we are obviously not intelligent enough.

Answer 3

You really need to research this more. Scientists have managed to create amino acids in a lab, which are the building blocks of life, though they have yet to manage to create a living being because we don't have advanced enough technology to do it.

Why do Christians think that we know everything we will ever know? That science has stopped advancing and learning?

Answer 4

First of all, creation of the most basic components of life IS possible in a specific contained environment. It can be done in any standard American classroom.

The problem:
There's no proof that there was enough of the specific gasses needed in the atmosphere for the beginning to take place. Scientists explain it by stating "It was all there." That's their proof. They have no evidence for the ideal situation to be able to take place.

Answer 5

4. Create a perfect system as "math" that governs the entire system from the largest star to the small atom....and always have it add up. For nothing random, can make something so precise as math.

5. Big Bang.....God spreading his arms out to create the Heavens and the Earth. hmm...big bang....that is moving outward.....hands being spread....hmmm, that's moving outward. Realize "man" tries to rewrite the words of God, but God was already right.

Answer 6

Sure, first lets experiment with a car. 1st get a big box, we'll call this the universe. 2nd take abunch of car parts and a bomb, this is the matter and the bang. Do you think we'll end up with a whole working car?

Answer 7

I hate to tell you this, but scientists were able to come up with Cloning, and if they are given what they need, who knows what else they can come up with.

What would you say if they take one of Saturn's moons and make it inhabitable? Will religous people oppose to that too because it is ursurpating the place of God?

Answer 8

Because you need a latent universe to do it, and an area without the universe in it is quite hard to build.

Answer 9

Be patient, grasshopper. Science is going to need a few more thousand years before we can do that.

Answer 10

They have to be un-intelligent to duplicate the process, otherwise, it isn't a duplication.