English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Paul here emphasizes what the woman needs: not merely sexual relations, but the affection due her. In other words if a husband is having sexual relations with his wife, but without true affection to her, he is not giving his wife what she is due or deserves. On the same idea, also the wife to her husband – the wife is not to withhold marital affection from her husband.

2007-03-03 04:34:42 · answer #1 · answered by thundercatt9 7 · 1 0

Let the husband ... - “Let them not imagine that there is any virtue in bring separate from each other, as if they were in a state of celibacy” - “Doddridge.” They are bound to each other; in every way they are to evince kindness, and to seek to promote the happiness and purity of each other.

There is a great deal of delicacy used here by Paul, and his expression is removed as far as possible from the grossness of pagan writers. His meaning is plain; but instead of using a word to express it which would be indelicate and offensive, he uses one which is not indelicate in the slightest degree.

The word which he uses εὔνοιαν eunoian,” benevolence”) denotes kindness, good-will, affection of mind. And by the use of the word “due” ὀφειλομένην opheilomenēn, he reminds them of the sacredness of their vow, and of the fact that in person, property, and in every respect, they belong to each other.

It was necessary to give this direction, for the contrary might have been regarded as proper by many who would have supposed there was special virtue and merit in living separate from each other; as facts have shown that many have imbibed such an idea - and it was not possible to give the rule with more delicacy than Paul has done.

Many mss., however, instead of “due benevolence,” read ὀφειλὴν opheilēn, “a debt, or that which is owed;” and this reading has been adopted by Griesbach in the text. Homer, with a delicacy not unlike the apostle Paul, uses the word φιλότητα filotēta, “friendship,” to express the same idea.

2007-03-03 05:16:15 · answer #2 · answered by Ask Mr. Religion 6 · 0 0

How I empathise with Martha! If my sister and that i've got been in that concern i may well be working around like a headless rooster, cooking and placing the table, and my sister may well be serenely sitting on the foot of the instructor listening heavily to each word. however the gender equality situation has not something to do with who did the kin chores. In Jesus' day, females weren't allowed to obtain individual coaching from the Rabbi's. men, specific. females, no. Jesus replace into progressive in this comprehend because of the fact he inspired females to obtain religious coaching. bear in suggestions the Samaratin woman on the properly and how Jesus spoke to her? not the carried out ingredient in that day and age. yet here he's, interior the homestead of Martha and Mary and he's actively encouraging them to pay attention and learn, giving them the prospect to have one to one coaching. it particularly is why this scripture helps gender equality. Jesus replace into way previous to his time. i ask your self who did the bathing up, nevertheless?

2016-12-18 04:51:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In name it does no such thing; rather it places emphasis on and sanctifies marriage.

See verses 1 to 14 inclusive:

Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:
11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
12 But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
13 And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.
14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

2007-03-03 04:38:31 · answer #4 · answered by Modern Major General 7 · 0 0

It supports the value of marriage equality.

Shalom

2007-03-03 04:28:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I am not a Christian but I believe women have equal rights than us men. And believe me, we fight hard to make sure women are not mistreated.

2007-03-03 04:36:35 · answer #6 · answered by David G 6 · 0 0

do tell.

2007-03-03 04:31:58 · answer #7 · answered by setfreejn836 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers