It is learnt that as late as in2006, FBI had no hard evidence of Osama's involvement in 9/11.Many have declared that Bush went to war against Saddam under unsubstantiated charges.
Should he not accept his guilt graciously and resign?
2007-03-03 03:06:53 · 11 answers · asked by The Tribune 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Sad but true, but the saddest part yet is Afghanistan and Iraq are but just two of the many manifestations of how US has turned from being a nation of using diplomacy and international standards of conduct into without a doubt the largest criminal orgainzation world has know.
Our whole State Department now uses threats of military force, funds so called Charity Organzations and NGOS to help undermine every country we supposedly are aiding to cause deliberate disruptions so we can militarily intervene.
WHY?
Power and money. Pure and simple.
Another WHY? Because no one can stop us, our European allies are defensless and so join in on the rapine acts, the UN hands out to highest bribes. Leaders in every small country in world knows that uless hey comply they may find themselves spirited out of country and sent to some place called hell or if lucky just get assasinated.
Our military thinks warfare is good for warfare so they could care less whom they are fighting for, all they have to say is the world is our enemy and son they may be right.
Of course an enamy as corrupt as you can be bribed and extored and just as long as you can afford him, you better get rid of him as in the case of Noriega of Panama or he may try to bring you down to his level.
Bush is not anymore responsible than the system of the people who now are elected and all the bureacratic ones who steal from everyone even our wouded heros at Walter Reed.
There is nothing gracious about Bush or Cheeny, they may wear Armani suits but as the old adage states: "you can put a gold ring in a pigs nose but it will still be a pig."
One snake with two heads each as poisonous as the other.
2007-03-03 03:51:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the problem you are viewing a politician as a REAL person. That's an oxymoron. Politicians generally twist the information to suit their best interest. Yes, I agree it is truly unsubstantiated but expecting him to behave as a responsible person and take the blame and the consequences is not going to happen. Think about human nature in today's society most people are not instilled with the gumption to accept the consequences.
2007-03-03 03:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
a million.) We went into Afghanistan while Bush replaced into in place of work. 2.) We went there as a results of fact we have faith it fairly is the place Osama Bin encumbered is. 3.) We adversarial Iraq as a results of fact of here motives: - we've been lied to. - falsified records. - non-biddable contracts offered to agencies with own connections to the Bush administration. - the insane claims that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 4.) it is not that we are in choose of the conflict in Afghanistan, that's that we sense Osama Bin encumbered merits what he gets for claiming duty for 9/11. al Queda has been utilising the mountainous area in that u . s . a . for a on the same time as now hiding out, so as that's the place we went.
2016-10-02 07:50:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tribune, al-Qaeda bombed the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11. You don't have to take George Bush's word for it - JUST ASK THEM!!! Al-Qaeda have been bragging about the fact that they carried out the September 11th terrorist attacks since they happened!!
As for Iraq, that was an oil war, pure and simple, An attempt to grab Iraq's oil for the benefit of the American, English and Dutch international oil companies.
Of course they had to lie to the American and British public about why they launched that war!!!
Beyond that, neither one of these wars are "Bush's war" they are US imperialism's wars, and are supported by both the Republican and Democratic Parties (as well as by Corporate America - the folks who tell Bush, the Republicans and the Democrats what to do!!!)
2007-03-03 03:14:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I've learnt that Bush defeated two evils. Saddam and the Taliban, two of the most oppressive regimes in modern history. Good riddens!
2007-03-03 03:20:09 · answer #5 · answered by Matt 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every congressman that voted for the war did so without any hard evidence. Should they also accept their guilt and resign graciously? Or should they just continue their Presidential campaign?
2007-03-03 03:12:09 · answer #6 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Get a life, Bush has fought no wars.
Listen to the liberal biased opinions and you will learn nothing.
Why not put Bill Clinton back in office. Put Chaos back in office. You my friend are badly misinformed. One other thing, the FBI has no experience in international affairs and was never designed to deal with anything outside the continental US.
Yep,
Hisemiester
2007-03-03 03:13:31 · answer #7 · answered by hisemiester 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
It will take impeachment to get rid of the crook! Watch the Documentary Fahrenheit 911 .. there's proof!
2007-03-03 03:14:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
He is so arrogant to recognize his mistakes. It is a condition from the wise men..........every body know his limited brain plus his his alcohol habits. he should be impeached for his crimes.
2007-03-03 03:20:31 · answer #9 · answered by maria r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
PROVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lame accusations is bunk without proof and you have no proof.
2007-03-03 03:13:17 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋