can you name them?
2007-03-03 01:52:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
theBerean: did you know that Denton has famously changed his position and is now an Evolutionist:
http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/latest_2003/theory-in-crisis.html
2007-03-03 02:06:09 · update #1
"In Nature's Destiny Denton refers to Kaufmann(1) and deDuve(2), to show that, given the right initial conditions, the origin of life and evolution is inevitable."
2007-03-03 02:06:48 · update #2
Lets see...I recently read Michael Dentons (a leading evolutionist) book , "Evolution; A Theory in Crisis". In which He frankly admitted that there was NO hard evidence for evolution, but He was going to keep believing in it anyway....theBerean NOTE TO BRENDON G: That my point. Denton admitted that evolution was immpossible in his 1986 book, but then "recanted" when the "heat" got too hot. (no more research grants maybe?). Man had no balls. But that doesnt invalidate what he originally wrote. You evolutionists are a confused bunch. And by the way, I saw him in debate once, and when asked to point to ONE fact that would prove evolution (in the q & a period) , he frankly admitted he could'nt.
2007-03-03 01:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by theBerean 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
4:
Chaos and Complexity in Astrophysics by Oded Regev
Plasma Physics for Astrophysics (Princeton Series in Astrophysics) by Russell Kulsrud
Advanced Astrophysics (Cambridge Planetary Science) by Neb Suric
Microbiology: An Introduction (9th Edition) by Gerard Tortora
2007-03-03 02:04:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
My textbooks (which are numerous) on subjects such as neurology, kinesiology, pediatric conditions, psychiatric conditions, cellular biology, anatomy and physiology. I also read Nat'l Geographic on a regular basis. And books by Daniel Quinn, which aren't scienece, but they are fictional books that use principles of science to basically explain away god. Why? Do you think that just because we believe God created earth we can read and understand science? It's a pretty ignorant thing to assume that science and evolution can't go hand in hand to some extent.
2007-03-03 01:59:54 · answer #3 · answered by olgapastuch 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You know what I find curious? That neither of the two female posters here that from their reading lists would seem to be pursuing Phds in science have ever asked or answered a single YA question in a science category.
Hmmm ...
make you think, eh?
2007-03-03 02:16:10 · answer #4 · answered by Brendan G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Defeating Darwinism, by Phillip Johnson.
2007-03-03 02:17:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Haha, to read some of the answeers here is just so funny.
I personally think they do read, but I don't think any amount of reading will change their 'knowledge' of god's existence.
2007-03-03 01:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by T Delfino 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ask them if they've read Darwin, Dawkins, Gould, Hawkins.
2007-03-03 02:04:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
mostly just college textbooks...whats your piont...Science books have nothing to do with religion, so Im missing the creationist and science connection here.
2007-03-03 02:07:02 · answer #8 · answered by Spades Of Columbia 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I read Stephen Hawkings, "A ____ In Time" i forgot the title.
2007-03-03 01:55:32 · answer #9 · answered by Class of '09 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
4-5.
Fiction is great!
My favorite is that one by the dude in the wheelchair,
A brief history of time.
2007-03-03 01:55:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋