Which movie is scarier?
2007-03-02 19:50:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
Psycho--the original
2007-03-02 19:53:09 · answer #1 · answered by Phartzalot 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Psycho seemed more "plausible" than Children of the Corn, so I'd have to go with Psycho. Neither of them really scared me much, though.
2007-03-03 03:53:40 · answer #2 · answered by answerator 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Psycho!
2007-03-03 05:07:32 · answer #3 · answered by starrynight1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Psycho.
2007-03-03 03:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by Bud's Girl 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Psycho was based on a true story.So it was consistant. It made "sense" as much as a perverted tail could, because it was true, as it happened.
Corn got stupid at the end. It was "scarier" I guess...but it got so nonsensical, I'm putting my vote on psycho.
2007-03-03 03:54:57 · answer #5 · answered by Debi in LA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
psycho without a doubt. it was ahead of its time. a groundbreaker. cannot judge it by all the things that came along since then. it was a real shocker when ifirst saw it in a drive in theater. tony perkins was wonderful. hitchcock never did better.
2007-03-03 03:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
psycho
2007-03-03 03:52:22 · answer #7 · answered by St♥rmy Skye 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Children of the Corn. Because of the creepy factor.
2007-03-03 03:53:29 · answer #8 · answered by Havana Brown 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
if i had to choose, children of the corn, very freaky, but i think jack nicholson in 'the shining' was one of the scariest things ive seen
2007-03-03 04:12:32 · answer #9 · answered by sydneygal 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
children of the corn
2007-03-03 03:53:57 · answer #10 · answered by fallen_angel 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋