I'm excited about it, it does look very interesting. Have you taken a look at the interviews on discovery.com? Quite interesting...
2007-03-02 14:39:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Probably not, looks old, boring, uninteresting, and an attack on Christianity for no reason.
I honestly do not believe that anyone thinks that this is Jesus Christ's tomb, not the producers, directors, researchers or anyone. They just want to take a cheap shot at Christianity, and frankly I believe that they are doing a weak job of it.
This is OLD "news" and nothing new is presented that is of any value. It proves nothing except that they hope if they attack Christianity that they think that they can make a buck. Maybe they are right about that, we shall see. I wish they would spend their time and money doing something better.
2007-03-02 15:09:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shawn D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Why do you think it will be interesting? Its all false lies and just TV and media hype to promote items to sell, nothing more.
1. Tomb has been there and known for 30 yrs and everyone already knew it was nothing of relevance.
2. DNA scrapings done from inside the tomb came back as no one related in the tomb or it was husband and wife or total strangers.
3. Jesus, Mary, Joesph are the most common names for that region, specially back in the day of Jesus.
4. There are over 9 other tombs in that same area with the same names.
5. The entire thing is nothing more than a marketing campaign that has been waged lately from the atheist groups. There are many coming " God " movies that they are releasing with false information, to lead people astray.
6. Read Revelations and realize all this is already spoken of.
2007-03-02 14:41:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes, I will be! Yeah, the chances are so great that 6 (possibly 7) of the bodies are all related in one way or the other and all the names just HAPPEN to be the very names that was of Jesus and close members of his family. Do you REALLY think that a man at the age of 33 would not be married with a family being that he was JEWISH? I CAN agree that he would try to keep that fact quiet from the officials for the safety of his wife and son. There was only one other grave with a person with the name "Jesus son of Joseph" found out of all the hundreds in Israel...but NONE with all these names who surrounded Jesus.
2007-03-02 15:05:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by hera 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes but I know it's not Jesus' bones. He took His body with Him to Heaven.
Note: these tombs were discovered 20 yrs ago. the bones of the male shows that he was about 20-25 yrs old when he died and the female btn 14-18 when she died.
These bones can give us DNA but we have no DNA from Jesus Christ or Mary Magdelene from 2000yrs ago. Plus the names Jesus and Mary were common back then. Enjoy watching a story about 2000 yrs bones of who-knows-who.
2007-03-02 14:49:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No. Some people dug up and disturbed a grave of people that had been buried there with the thought that they would get to die in peace and not be bothered 2 thousand years later when a bunch of stupid people decided to look at their bones. It's not jesus. Even if it WAS jesus, he would have just been a normal human being with no powers at all.
2007-03-02 14:41:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The same was discovered in the 1980's. Somebody wants to capitalize on the DaVinci Code
2007-03-02 14:44:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by rapturefuture 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. I have heard an indepth review of those findings and find them without any merit. Consider the source. What do you really know about this guy? Check out his scientific credentials. I know where Jesus Christ is, so know these bones and boxes have nothing to do with Him.
2007-03-02 14:48:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Verily thy Lord will judge between them on the Day of Judgment, in the matters wherein they differ (among themselves)
Qur'an (32:25)
2007-03-02 14:47:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. And if Jesus were just another guy then he must be a liar or a lunatic. Of course he's not just another guy.
2007-03-02 14:40:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋