Its funny, but most people who use the Crusades as an example of Christianity gone equally militant as Islam leave out one small issue...but for global Jihad, there would have been no Crusade.
The chruch invented the crusade concept to ward off Jihad, which was engulfing the world. In fact, the Jihadists made it to the gates of Vienna twice! They didnt simply usurp the Jewish and Christian holylands (keep in mind, their holiest of holys is mecca), they had overtaken the whole of India, middle-east, and parts of europe.
The problem the chruch had is that the creation of a religious duty to go to war had no basis in the new testament and thus it was entirely a chruch construct, which is why people today bash the Crusaders to heavly.
To Muslims bash the arabs who invaded India (greatest genocide ever) or took over the holy lands? Not at all, they ravenously defend it...as they should...it IS their doctrine...no contradition.
2007-03-02
13:38:49
·
4 answers
·
asked by
PragmaticMan
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality