English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who comes up with these stupid little story type things that "disprove non-believing". Does anybody actually fall for this logic?

"When you look at a building, how do you know that there was a builder?
You didn't see the builder, you didn't see the workmen as the building was being built and you never saw the plans that they used. So how then do you know that there was a builder?
The building is evidence that there was a builder, so it is with creation. Building = builder duh, Creation = Creator."

(i've also heard one about hair cuts)

What's wrong with this logic? Well I've never seen god working... I've seen buildings being built. I've never talked to god when he wasn't at work. I've talked to construction workers when they weren't at work. I know that all buildings were built by humans because there are building companies, pictures of buildings being built and even blueprints...
Don't you see that these prove absolutely nothing?

2007-03-02 13:02:34 · 6 answers · asked by funaholic 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

@ Uncle Thesis - Care to explain instead of just give a stupid saying (the kind of thing i was bashing)

2007-03-02 13:15:29 · update #1

6 answers

Yes, they're just logical fallacies designed to pull the wool over people's eyes.

2007-03-02 13:11:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

How does it not prove anything .. ? If you see a building, you know that someone built it, unless it magically over millions of years, went through millions of beneficial mutations and became a building (what evolutionists want us to believe, and if you do, I think your pretty thick)

"I've talked to construction workers when they weren't at work. "
That doesn't mean that they DON'T work, and if they do work, im sure they make buildings, so technically they are the builders of that building-- or shall I say the creators of that building .. ?

Explain to me, exactly why you think this logic is wrong .. ?

There is a quote and it goes something like this: "The first step to knowing, is that you know nothing"
Now some people don't understand this, they find it completely absurd, that's because they dont bother to look at the whole picture.
This quote basically means that if you want knowledge, you need to understand that there is A LOT of stuff that you don't know. As a matter of fact, the things that you do know are pretty much negligible in light of the things that you don't know.

Anyway that was to show you to look at the whole picture; before you ask the question.

2007-03-02 18:08:31 · answer #2 · answered by =reminisce 2 · 0 0

Wait a minute.

I have seen Gods work: miracles
I have talked to God: in my prayers
I know that all things were created by God b/c there is no proof that evolution is fact. Because of the Bible. Because of the complexity of living things.

See you can not say that this is not logical. You can not prove I have not talked with God nor seen miracles.

We could go on and on but the logic behind it is simple:

Buildings=builders
Creations=Creator

The logic is fine, its you don't believe the things around you are created. There is a difference. People inherited that from their maker, they create, they don't evolve things into existence. As they are created they evolve however the creation came first.

God Bless

2007-03-02 13:18:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

As always, most arguments only work for one who already believes, whereas one who doesn't won't be swayed in the least. We can't prove to you that there is a God, and you can't disprove it to us.

Oh well.

2007-03-02 13:11:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Dear Mr. Funaholic:
You're rather short-sighted, aren't you?
Buy glasses to see the WHOLE picture.

2007-03-02 13:12:28 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 0 2

You are absolutely correct.

2007-03-02 13:08:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers