Could His descendants be nuts, alchoholics, morons, or gifted?
As you see this is a balanced question just plain scientific curiosity.
2007-03-02 10:32:29 · 8 answers · asked by Nacho Libre 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
was he a real person or something else? how old was he exactly?
2007-03-02 10:37:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, he didn't have any descendants, nor is his body available to gain DNA off of, though you could probably find some decendants of his brothers, not sure if those are tracked anywhere. And for the people who don't believe Jesus existed that posted before me...
Seriously. No other historical figure has been better documented throughout the centuries. Ever. Who are you kidding?
2007-03-02 18:40:11 · answer #2 · answered by GodsKnite 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After 2000 thousand years, I don't think his DNA will make much of a difference.
The real question that will be answered is whether or not he had kids....ie, had sex, had a wife.
2007-03-02 18:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by Nameless 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they'd have to find his DNA first.
And prove he had children.
And prove the generations survived through 2000 years.
2007-03-02 18:38:16 · answer #4 · answered by Doug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-one will ever know if a sample of DNA belonged to the character that the Bible is based on (if he ever existed at all).
2007-03-02 18:36:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
well, considering that every man and his brother was named Jesus, there is no proof whatsoever that this man is the Jesus of the Bible. anyone who is dumb enough to not know that shouldn't own a computer.
2007-03-02 18:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He has no decendants, you won't find his DNA since you won't find His remains. Stop drinking the kool aid.
2007-03-02 18:37:43 · answer #7 · answered by Scott B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be ironic if they were atheists.. hahahaha
2007-03-02 18:35:57 · answer #8 · answered by Bad Church Lady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋