English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here is an article that says so.
http://www.medsocial.com/blog.aspx?blogaction=viewblog&show=280

2007-03-02 09:13:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

7 answers

this guy Dr Julz, is a nut and misquotes alot. Suggest you read the journal of the american medical association if you want the straight facts. A "blog" is NOT an article, it's an opinion. And this one is not very good, nor is it supported in fact.

2007-03-02 09:19:01 · answer #1 · answered by essentiallysolo 7 · 0 1

Try Vitamin C therapy. A few years ago a cancer researcher came out with a paper saying that the best cancer and infection fighter as yet found was Interferon, but, at the time, it cost $15,000 a gram. The good part was that Interferon was a product of the natural breakdown of Vitamin C in your system. The FDA says that the RDA for Vit C is 64 mg a day, just enough to prevent scurvy. Linus Pauling, who got a Nobel Prize for his work with Vit C and a second Nobel Prize for organic chemistry, said 1000 mg a day as a minimum and 2000 mg a day if you are sick. On a personal note, I was sick twice a year, for 2 weeks at a time, for 20 years, and was flat on my back for at least a week each time. To this day the doctors have no idea what the problem was. After I gave up on the doctors I tried Vit C. I took enough to keep from being sick and just below too much to get diarrhea. It followed a bell curve over 2 weeks with a peak at 40,000 mg a day – about 300,000 over the 2 weeks. I was not sick for those 2 weeks and after a couple of years of that I have not been sick since. I did not dissolve my kidneys, as some doctors said would happen. I did not get any calcium build up or stones and did not dissolve my cones or solidify my joints. Try it, but drink a lot of water – Vit C is a natural diuretic.

2007-03-04 02:55:57 · answer #2 · answered by David M 2 · 0 1

I think you are misinterpreting the blog.

There has recently been alot of research papers on cancer stem cells.

All organs have some stem cells to replace mature cells. Some like bone marrow have more than others. There is a theory that cancer arises from some of these stem cells.

The publishers also believe curing cancer means eliminating the cancerous stem cells not using stem cells like you stated. Researchers believe that these cancer stem cells are particularly resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Perhaps because as stem cells, they are non-differentiated and can mutate (evolve) easier.

http://www.brainlife.org/abstract/2006/nakano_i20060401.htm

http://www.brainlife.org/abstract/2006/clarke_mf061001.htm

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/24/1755

http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030482

P.S. What's the deal with posting a variant of the same question with the same reference under different usernames?

2007-03-02 10:28:03 · answer #3 · answered by oncogenomics 4 · 1 0

that is a debatable theory. there is data for and antagonistic to the idea of a maximum cancers stem cellular. What caused this theory is they implanted maximum cancers cells into mice to get them to reinforce cancers. although, often times cancers not in any respect stepped ahead. They then appeared at human being maximum cancers cells and placed merely a small share of maximum cancers cells would divide and convey different maximum cancers cells. although, some researchers say that there would properly be a subset of maximum cancers cells that divide, even though it isn't because they're 'stem cells'. operating example, they don't look real stem cells because they do no longer have markers many times linked with stem cells. i imagine the truth lies someplace in between. there are likely progenitor maximum cancers cells that are energetic, yet they are not real stem cells. this is an exciting theory that continues to be being worked out. all of us look ahead to the data.

2016-11-27 00:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am not sure that stem cells will cure breast cancer. Actually there are different treatments that are carried out to cure the disease. I found a website which tells everything about cancer. You can also just check it out to get many informations.

http://www.canceronline.biz/

http://www.canceronline.biz/breastcancer%20treatment.htm

2007-03-02 20:13:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Breast Cancer is many different disease and each is unique to it self. That is why the treatment varies and are many.
So to lump BC cure into one category will never work. Some are very slow others are fast some are estrogen driven some not to make it simple.
It always amazes me how little ppl know about cancer.

2007-03-02 12:28:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2007-03-02 09:16:39 · answer #7 · answered by teresa d 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers